Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

Danek v. Hommer

Document Cited authorities 1 Cited in 1 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date08 February 1954
PartiesJohn DANEK, plaintiff, v. Julius J. HOMMER et al., defendants-respondents, New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, defendant-petitioner.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Page 465

14 N.J. 465

102 A.2d 693

John DANEK, plaintiff, v. Julius J. HOMMER et al., defendants-respondents, New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, defendant-petitioner.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Feb. 8, 1954.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below: 28 N.J.Super. 68, 100 A.2d 198.

Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, Newark, for the petitioner.

McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, Newark, for the respondents.

Granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Voorhees v. Preferred Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • March 20, 1991
    ...44 N.J. 504, 512, 210 A.2d 221 (1965); Danek v. Hommer, 28 N.J.Super. 68, 77, 100 A.2d 198 (App.Div.1953), certif. granted 14 N.J. 465, 102 A.2d 693 (1954), aff'd 15 N.J. 573, 105 A.2d 677 (1954); 8 Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice (Berdal ed. 1979), § 4683 at 42. The duty to defend ari......
  • Cole v. Thompson
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • February 15, 1954

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT