Danforth v. Foster

Citation139 S.W. 520,158 Mo. App. 94
PartiesDANFORTH et al. v. FOSTER et al.
Decision Date20 July 1911
CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; Alfred Page, Judge.

Action by P. C. Danforth and others against B. F. Foster and others. From a judgment dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Wright Bros., for appellants. E. D. Merritt, for respondents.

GRAY, J.

September 12, 1910, the plaintiffs instituted this suit in the Greene county circuit court. The petition recites that about the year 1810 there was organized the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, and thereafter the Christian colored people of the United States of America formed themselves in a body known as the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, and those who became members of said Church were adherents to the doctrines taught by the Cumberland Presbyterian Church; that the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, at all times had its governing bodies, to wit, The General Assembly, the Synods, the Presbyteries, and the Sessions; that many years ago a congregation of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, was organized in the city of Springfield, Mo., and was and is known as the First Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, of Springfield; that many Christian people of the colored race are members thereof; that said members are adherents to the religious doctrines of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored; that said doctrines are in many respects different from the doctrines of any other Presbyterian Church; that said Colored Presbyterian Church was incorporated several years ago, and is the owner of certain real estate in Springfield, and has erected on said property a large and commodious church edifice and other buildings for the use of the church and its members; that on the 7th day of August, 1910, the defendants and those interested in common with them, renounced the religious doctrines of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, and their allegiance to said Church, and declared themselves no longer members of said Church, but declared themselves to be members of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, a separate and distinct religious church organization; that by reason of said action, the defendants declare themselves no longer members of said Presbyterian Church, Colored, and are not now members of the said Church; that the plaintiffs and their said associates have remained in the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, and are now the only true and lawful beneficiaries of said property, and are entitled to the exclusive possession, use, and control of said ownership, and that defendants and their associates have lost all their rights and privileges in said church, and to its said property; that the said defendants and their associates continue to hold religious services in said church, although denying that they are holding such services as Cumberland Presbyterians, and said defendants are denying to plaintiffs and their said associates the right to occupy said church building and property as Cumberland Presbyterians, and are denying them the right to worship in said church building as Cumberland Presbyterians, and are denying the plaintiffs and their associates the right to use and occupy the church building as a congregation of Cumberland Presbyterians, and that the defendants and their associates claim to be the owners of said property as Presbyterians.

The petition then concludes as follows: "Wherefore, inasmuch as plaintiffs and their said associates have no adequate remedy at law, they pray for an order of injunction to issue out of this court directed to the defendants and those interested in common with them, enjoining them and restraining them and each of them from using and occupying said land and church building and other buildings on said land, and from holding services of any kind in said church building or on said premises, and from interfering with or molesting the plaintiffs, and their said associates who adhere to the Cumberland land Presbyterian Church, Colored, and the religious doctrines thereof, in the use, enjoyment, possession and exclusive control of said land and the church building and other buildings on said land and from delivering the possession of said land and building to any other person or persons."

The answer admitted the allegations of the petition in regard to the organization of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, and also the local church, and admitted that said church was the owner of the property described in the plaintiffs' petition, and denied that defendants or any of them had any thought, purpose or intent of withdrawing from said Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, and affirmatively alleged that defendants at all times mentioned in plaintiffs' petition were members of said Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, and with no present thought or purpose of withdrawing from said church. The cause was tried on the 23d day of September, resulting in a dismissal of plaintiffs' bill, and from such judgment, they have appealed to this court.

The Cumberland Presbyterian Church, Colored, is a separate organization from the Cumberland Presbyterian Church,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Wyrick v. Wyrick
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • March 26, 1912
    ...... this is more especially true where, as in this case, the. witnesses have testified orally. [Foster v. Williams, 144 Mo.App. 219, 128 S.W. 797; Danforth v. Foster, 158 Mo.App. 94, 139 S.W. 520; Rood v. Crocus. Hill Mining Co., 157 Mo.App. 405, ......
  • Clarkson v. Standard Brass Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kansas
    • March 1, 1943
    ...... this court will defer largely to the chancellor's. findings on conflicting testimony. Warwick v. Warwick, 145 S.W. 144, 146; Foster v. Williams, . 128 S.W. 797, 799; Douforth v. Foster, 139 S.W. 520,. 521. (2) Plaintiff is entitled to recover for commissions on. sales made to ......
  • Clarkson v. Standard Brass Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • March 1, 1943
    ...chancellor's findings on conflicting testimony. Warwick v. Warwick, 145 S.W. 144, 146; Foster v. Williams, 128 S.W. 797, 799; Douforth v. Foster, 139 S.W. 520, 521. (2) Plaintiff is entitled to recover for commissions on sales made to the Whitaker Battery Supply Company because he was the p......
  • Ewing v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kansas
    • April 3, 1944
    ......Lambert et al. (Mo. App.), . 161 S.W.2d 732; Lester Real Estate Co. v. City of St. L., 169 Mo. 227, 69 S.W. 300; Danforth v. Foster, 158 Mo.App. 94, 139 S.W. 520; City of St. Louis v. Senter Comm. Co., 84 S.W.2d 133. (3) The decree. is fully justified under the law ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT