Daniels v. State

Decision Date25 April 2007
Docket NumberNo. 3D05-368.,3D05-368.
Citation954 So.2d 718
PartiesTavares Darrell DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Maria T. Armas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

SUAREZ, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction of second-degree murder and life sentence. We affirm.

The defendant contends he should receive a new trial because evidence that a witness was threatened before trial was improperly admitted, and because witnesses revealed that the defendant had already been convicted of the charged offenses in a previous trial. He argues that these errors cumulatively deprived him of a fair trial. The State asserts that no error occurred.

The defendant was tried in 2001 for first-degree murder, attempted robbery, and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. He was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. This Court reversed and remanded for a new trial. The defendant was retried in the instant case in 2004.

The defendant admits he shot the victim, Donnell Holmes, but claims the shooting was accidental. The victim and Gad Baker drove to an apartment complex for Baker to discuss business with a woman. The victim was wearing gold jewelry. The victim asked the defendant, who was standing outside the complex, where they could find the woman who Baker was meeting. The defendant directed the victim to a second-floor apartment. While Baker and the woman conversed, Baker heard scuffling noises outside and noticed the victim was no longer standing nearby. He saw the victim, the defendant and co-defendant Anthony Montgomery fighting in the apartment's courtyard. The victim was beating up Montgomery. Montgomery tossed a gun to the defendant which he picked up and fired at the victim while scuffling with him. The victim fell and the defendant ran away. The victim died of a single gunshot wound to the heart. The jewelry was still on the victim's body after the shooting.

Police located the defendant several months after the shooting in South Carolina. The defendant told police that Montgomery decided to steal the victim's jewelry and followed him into the complex. The defendant saw the victim and Montgomery fighting, and the victim was winning. As the defendant approached, Montgomery threw a gun to him and asked whether the defendant "want[ed] some of this too." The victim pushed the defendant and the defendant decided to shoot him. The victim fell and the defendant ran away. He threw the gun in a nearby field. The defendant changed his hairstyle and took a bus to South Carolina a few days later. Lamesha Parker, an eyewitness to the shooting, testified at trial that Montgomery tossed the gun to the defendant. The gun hit the ground. The defendant picked the gun up and shot the victim.

Lamesha Parker testified over defense objection that she received several threats about testifying. At trial she testified that, at another court proceeding, the defendant looked at her and made a slashing motion across his throat. Without stating that the other court proceeding was the first trial on these charges, she noted that the jury must have seen the gesture also. She testified that on another occasion, a boy named David came to her house and told her that the Defendant said for her not to go to court. Finally, prior to the retrial, she received a letter from her brother, Donnell Parker, telling her to tell the truth and not to lie about the defendant's case. The letter also contained handwriting she did not recognize. Donnell identified this writing as defendant's. He explained the defendant had not threatened her and he wrote to his sister on his own accord "cause I see [the defe...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles
  • The trial (conduct of trial, jury instructions, verdict)
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • April 30, 2021
    ...the threat is made by a third party but the defendant is not implicated, if the witness’ credibility is in question. Daniels v. State, 954 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) An improper comment about the defendant’s character can be remedied with a proper curative instruction. When an improper c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT