Daniels v. State, ED 105432

Decision Date24 July 2018
Docket NumberNo. ED 105432,ED 105432
Citation551 S.W.3d 110 (Mem)
Parties Jeryl DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

FOR APPELLANT: Kristina Starke Olson, District Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Julia E. Neidhardt, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeryl Daniels appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT