Dart v. Bagley
Decision Date | 09 May 1892 |
Citation | 110 Mo. 42,19 S.W. 311 |
Parties | DART v. BAGLEY et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Action by E. M. Dart against V. W. Bagley and others to redeem certain land. From a judgment sustaining demurrers to his petition, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by GANTT, J.:
This was an action brought by the appellant to redeem certain real estate from a sale made under a power contained in a deed of trust. The appellant, in September, 1891, made his deed of trust to respondent Bagley, as trustee, to secure a certain note therein described, payable to the order of respondent Bunker. The note was not paid at maturity. The power in the deed provided that Bagley might, upon such contingency, sell the land conveyed at public vendue, after first giving "twenty days" public notice of the time, terms, and place of sale, and of the property to be sold, by advertisement in some newspaper printed and published in the city of Kansas, Mo." At the time the deed of trust and the sale thereunder were made, Rev. St. 1889 were in force, of which statutes sections 312-314, in relation to advertisements, are as follows: And sections 7092, 7093, Rev. St. 1889, are as follows: For more than one year before January 1, 1890, and at the time of making said deed of trust and sale thereunder, the City of Kansas was a city in the state of Missouri, having a population of more than 100,000 inhabitants, and situate in the twenty-fourth judicial circuit of said state. On the 1st day of January, 1890, in due form, and taking all the steps prescribed by section 312, Rev. St. 1889, supra, the judges of the twenty-fourth judicial circuit, acting as a board, duly let to the Kansas City Times, a newspaper of the kind prescribed in said section, the publication of "all advertisements, judicial notices, and orders of publication required by law to be made," mentioned in said section 312, and the newspaper duly executed its contract and bond to publish the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Owen v. Baer
...existing, and not applicable to any other city which may in the future attain that population. State v. Tolle, 71 Mo. 645; Dart v. Bagley, 110 Mo. 42, 19 S. W. 311; State v. Herrmann, 75 Mo. 340; Wheeler v. Philadelphia, 77 Pa. St. 338. Acts of the legislature are to be construed as having ......
-
Meyer & Company v. Unemployment Comp. Comm.
...our Constitution the Title of a statute is necessarily a part thereof, and is to be considered in construction. [Dart v. Bagley et al., 110 Mo. 42, l.c. 51, 19 S.W. 311; Glaser v. Rothschild, 221 Mo. 180, l.c. 212, 120 S.W. 1.] The Title begins: "An act to provide for the establishment and ......
-
State ex rel. State Corp. Comm'n v. Old Abe Co.
...of Mobile v. Board of Revenue and Road Com'rs, 202 Ala. 303, 80 So. 368; Commonwealth v. Barney, 115 Ky. 475, 74 S.W. 181; Dart v. Bagley, 110 Mo. 42, 19 S.W. 311; People, etc., v. Davenport, 91 N.Y. 574; State v. Robinson, 32 Or. 43, 48 P. 357; Lovett v. Ferguson, 10 S.D. 44, 71 N.W. 765; ......
-
Hatcher v. Hall
...& Coke Co., 220 Mo. 580, 592, 119 S.W. 565, 567; State ex rel. Frisby v. Stone, 152 Mo. 202, 210, 53 S.W. 1069, 1071; Dart v. Bagley, 110 Mo. 42, 52-53, 19 S.W. 311, 313; State ex rel. Attorney General v. Heidorn, 74 Mo. 410, 412; City of Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 52 Mo. 424, 429; Dillbeck v......