Daul v. Dewey, Docket No. 10888
Citation | 37 Mich.App. 708,195 N.W.2d 309 |
Decision Date | 20 January 1972 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 10888,No. 3,3 |
Parties | Lloyd DAUL and Jo Ann Daul and George D. Stribley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harold A. DEWEY et al., Defendants-Appellees |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
George D. Stribley, Muskegon, for plaintiffs-appellants.
John B. Olsen, Muskegon, for Dewey.
Robert N. Hammond, Grand Rapids, for Farm Bureau.
G. Anthony Edens, Grand Rapids, for Pioneer Mut.
John C. Buchanan, Grand Rapids, for Sill Mtg. Inc.
Before R. B. BURNS, P.J., and FITZGERALD and V. J. BRENNAN, JJ.
Defendant, Still Mortgages, Inc., assigned a mortgage to defendant, Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, which had been taken on plaintiffs' home. Sometime thereafter, plaintiffs' home was extensively damaged by fire. Upon discovering that fire insurance had never been issued for their home, plaintiffs instituted suit against the defendants. The suit was settled by stipulation which reads, in part:
claims against the defendants be settled for $4,000. * * *
The estimated costs of restoration known by plaintiffs during negotiations were $700 over the settlement figure of $4,000. Plaintiffs were unable to obtain satisfactory financing for the extra $700. After a time, the restoration cost estimate rose to $6,500. Approximately 7 1/2 months after the execution of the stipulation agreement plaintiffs' house was found unsafe and condemned by the City of Muskegon. Plaintiffs have not restored their house and admit they have no intention of doing so in the future. Plaintiffs' purpose in the present suit is to obtain the $4,000 held by Farm Bureau to purchase household furniture. Farm Bureau desires to apply the $4,000 against the plaintiffs' mortgage debt. Farm Bureau has instituted foreclosure proceedings because of plaintiffs' default on the debt.
Pursuant to the declaratory judgment procedure of GCR 1963, 521, the trial judge upheld Farm Bureau's decision to apply the $4,000 against the mortgage debt. Plaintiffs had plenty of time to arrange for restoration of the mortgaged home. The record does not present a case of 'supervening impossibility' 1 excusing the plaintiffs from their contractual promises to restore the house.
Regardless of how the stipulation agreement terminated we still have the problem of disbursing the $4,000. The contract contains no provision for distribution of the $4,000 on any conditions other than restoration of the house. In 'ascertaining the intention of the parties' the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Starkey
...N.W.2d 520 (1975), lv. den. 397 Mich. 888 (1976). Such a lien, if not waived or released, will be upheld. Daul v. Sill Mortgages, Inc., 37 Mich.App. 708, 711, 195 N.W.2d 309 (1972). In the instant case, defendant and her attorney entered into a contingent fee arrangement whereby the attorne......
- Burdick v. Hartwig, Docket No. 10855