Davidson v. State
Decision Date | 15 March 1899 |
Citation | 50 S.W. 365 |
Parties | DAVIDSON et al. v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
L. M. Callaway and R. E. Dodson, for appellants. Robt. A. John, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The judgment in this case was affirmed at a former day of this term (49 S. W. 372), and now comes before us on motion for rehearing.
Appellants, in their amended motion for rehearing, state that the verdict of the jury, as written on the indictment, reads as follows: Appellants' complaint is: Whatever may have been the rule heretofore in reference to the construction of verdicts of this character, we hold that such a verdict as the one rendered in this case is not now subject to the criticism made to the same by appellants' counsel. As stated by the court in the case of Mootry v. State, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 457, 33 S. W. 877, and 34 S. W. 126, "That is certain which can be made certain." A bare inspection of the verdict in this case shows that the jury intended to assess a punishment of two years' confinement in the penitentiary against each of the appellants. The judgment rendered thereon is in direct response to that verdict. In the Mootry Case, supra, the verdict there rendered was death, upon Mootry and Rolly; but we understand the effect of the decision in that case is to overrule the previous decisions of this court, holding verdicts of a similar kind to the one here under discussion void. A fair construction of the verdict in this case will indicate that the jury intended to inflict upon...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Territory v. West.
...that the burden is upon the defendant to sustain it. 1 Bishop's Cr. Pr. § 816; Davidson et al. v. State, 40 Tex. Cr. R. 285, 49 S. W. 372, 50 S. W. 365; Fehr v. State, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 93, 35 S. W. 381, 650; Willis v. State, 24 Tex. App. 586, 6 S. W. 857; Commonwealth v. Daley, 70 Mass. 209; ......
-
Johnson v. State
...Lockhart v. Same, 32 Tex. Cr. R. 149, 22 S. W. 413; and see 2 Bish. Cr. Proc. §§ 700, 702. The verdict is sufficient. See Davidson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 50 S. W. 365; Mootry v. Same, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 457, 33 S. W. 877, 34 S. W. 126; Polk v. Same, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 495, 34 S. W. Appellants ins......
-
Walker v. State
...of the lower court was affirmed without argument. The case of J. E. Davidson & J. B. Thompson v. State, 40 Tex. Cr. R. 285, 49 S.W. 372, 50 S.W. 365, is also in point. In that case appellants were jointly indicted, charged with theft of one head of cattle. The verdict was as follows: "We, t......
-
Smith v. State, 25061
...Polk v. State, 35 Tex.Cr.R. 495, 34 S.W. 633, 634, where the jury assessed "their punishment at life imprisonment"; in Davidson v. State, 40 Tex.Cr.R. 285, 50 S.W. 365, wherein the verdict "assess their punishment at two years"; and in Garza v. State, 43 Tex.Cr.R. 499, 66 S.W. 1098, 1099, w......