Daviess-Martin County Rural Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Commission

Decision Date15 June 1961
Docket NumberDAVIESS-MARTIN,No. 19283,19283
Citation175 N.E.2d 439,132 Ind.App. 610
Parties, 39 P.U.R.3d 384 COUNTY RURAL TELEPHONE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION of Indiana: John Van Ness, Ira Haymaker, Leslie Duvall, as Members of the Public Service Commission of Indiana, and Indiana Telephone Corporation, Appellees.
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Gray & Waddle, Petersburg, Tennis & Cochran, Sullivan, Jack E. Hayes, Washington, for appellant.

Claude M. Warren, Indianapolis, Goodrich, Campbell & Warren, Indianapolis, Of Counsel, for appellee, Indiana Telephone Corp.

Frank L. Harlor, Public Counsellor, Asst., Indianapolis and Edwin K. Steers, Atty. Gen., for Public Service Comm.

COOPER, Judge.

On April 26, 1961, this court affirmed the order and decision of the Public Service Commission in the foregoing cause.

The appellant filed on May 5, 1961, Petition for Rehearing, alleging error of this court in the following respects:

'1. In failing to give a statement in writing and in failing to give a decision thereon of a substantial question arising on the record and presented by Appellant's Brief, to-wit:

'The constitutional question that the Order of the Commission is a confiscation of the property of the Appellant in violation of the Bill of Rights of the Indiana Constitution, Article I, § 12, and the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution.

'2. In failing to give a statement in writing and in failing to give a decision thereon of a substantial question arising on the record and presented by Appellant's Brief, to-wit:

'That the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to a telephone utility by the Public Service Commission is without authority under the provisions of Chapter 158 of the Acts of 1951, since said Act does not provide for the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity by the Public Service Commission either within the provisions of the Act itself or within the Title thereto.

'3. In failing to give a statement in writing and in failing to give a decision thereon of a substantial question arising on the record and presented by Appellant's Brief, to-wit:

'The issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to a telephone utility by the Public Service Commission under the provisions of Chapter 158 of the Acts of 1951 is unconstitutional under the provisions of Article 4, Section 19 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana for the reason that such provision in the Act is not expressed in the Title thereto, and is, therefore, void.'

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Wallace v. Duckworth
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • November 19, 1985
    ...(in banc), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 934, 87 S.Ct. 958, 17 L.Ed.2d 806 (1967); Daviess-Martin Co. Rural Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Comm'n, 132 Ind.App. 610, 625, 175 N.E.2d 439, 440 (1961) (in banc), Kennedy v. Kennedy, 241 Ind. 633, 638, 174 N.E.2d 410, 411 (1961) (per curiam). Petitio......
  • Cunningham v. Hiles
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • March 25, 1980
    ...240; Stucker v. College Life Ins. Co. (1965), 139 Ind.App. 422, 211 N.E.2d 320, 321; Daviess-Martin County Rural Tel. Corp. v. Public Service Commission (1961), 132 Ind.App. 610, 175 N.E.2d 439, 440; Groves v. Burton (1955), 125 Ind.App. 302, 123 N.E.2d 705, This Court may, however, modify ......
  • Naked City, Inc. v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 27, 1982
    ...176, 264 N.E.2d 335; Welsh, Governor, et al. v. Sells et al. (1963), 244 Ind. 423, 193 N.E.2d 359; Daviess-Martin Co. etc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm. (1961), 132 Ind.App. 610, 175 N.E.2d 439; Stillabower et al. v. Lizart et al. (1959), 130 Ind.App. 65, 161 N.E.2d 195. By dismissing the State's pet......
  • Weishaar v. Burton, 19360
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 15, 1962
    ... ... owners of certain real estate in Newton County, Indiana, and prayed for partition and a decree ... as it is not prohibited by law or violates public policy. 29 West's Indiana Law Encyclopedia, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT