Davis v. Catsimatidis
Decision Date | 10 June 2015 |
Docket Number | 2013-08227 |
Citation | 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 04803,129 A.D.3d 766,12 N.Y.S.3d 141 |
Parties | Angella DAVIS, plaintiff, v. John CATSIMATIDIS, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant; KFC U.S. Properties, Inc., etc., et al., third-party defendants-appellants-respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
LeClairRyan, New York, N.Y. (Timothy E. Shanley of counsel), for third-party defendants-appellants-respondents.
Nicholas Katsoris, New York, N.Y. (Dara Siegel and Kaitlyn Costello of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., L. PRISCILLA HALL, JEFFREY A. COHEN, and JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated June 21, 2013, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for contractual indemnification in the third-party complaint, and the defendant third-party plaintiff, John Catsimatidis, cross-appeals from so much of the same order as granted that branch of the motion of the third-party defendants which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action for common-law indemnification and contribution in the third-party complaint.
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the third-party defendants.
On January 28, 2004, the plaintiff allegedly fell on an area of snow and ice on the public sidewalk in front of a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant which was leased from the defendant third-party plaintiff, John Catsimatidis. The lease between Catsimatidis, as landlord, and KFC National Management Companies, as tenant, provided, inter alia, that the tenant agreed to indemnify the landlord for damages for injuries “occurring on said premises and arising out of the Tenant's use and Occupancy.” KFC had ceased operating at the subject location more than a month before the plaintiff allegedly fell, and had given notice to Catsimatidis by fax dated January 7, 2004, of its intention to terminate the lease. A “Lease Termination Agreement,” dated February 6, 2004, terminated the remaining term of the lease and all obligations thereunder as of February 29, 2004.
In August 2005, the plaintiff commenced this action against Catsimatidis, who then commenced a third-party action against KFC U.S. Properties, Inc., doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken, KFC National Management Company, doing business as Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Kentucky Fried Chicken (hereinafter collectively the KFC defendants), seeking damages for contractual and common-law indemnification and contribution.
The Supreme Court properly granted the branch of the motion of the KFC defendants which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for common-law indemnification. The KFC defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing that cause of action by submitting proof that they had no duty to remove snow from the premises and, therefore, that the plaintiff's injuries, if any, were not the result of their negligence (see Mikelatos v. Theofilaktidis, 105 A.D.3d 822, 825, 962 N.Y.S.2d 693 ; ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Trigoso v. Correa
-
Hannigan v. Staples, Inc.
...to plaintiff nor owed a duty of reasonable care to Inland independent of its contractual obligation (see Davis v. Catsimatidis, 129 A.D.3d 766, 768, 12 N.Y.S.3d 141 [2015] ; Bermingham v. Peter, Sr. & Mary L. Liberatore Family Ltd. Partnership, 94 A.D.3d 1424, 1425, 942 N.Y.S.2d 296 [2012] ......
-
Vivar v. Key Food Stores Co-Op.
... ... Daniel , 221 A.D.2d 938, 939, 634 N.Y.S.2d 588 [4th Dept ... 1995]) and indemnification provisions are "strictly ... construed" ( Davis v Catsimatidis , 129 A.D.3d ... 766, 768, 12 N.Y.S.3d 141 [2d Dept 2015]). Thus, "[t]he ... promise to indemnify should not be found unless it can ... ...
-
Rodriguez v. 5432-50 Myrtle Ave., LLC, 2015-09272, Index No. 9912/11.
...cross claims, for common-law indemnification and contribution, Myrtle failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Davis v. Catsimatidis, 129 A.D.3d 766, 768, 12 N.Y.S.3d 141 ). Additionally, in response to Midway's prima facie demonstration of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law......