Davis v. Com.
| Decision Date | 07 December 1923 |
| Parties | DAVIS v. COMMONWEALTH. |
| Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County.
T Davis was convicted of having in possession a moonshine or illicit still, and he appeals. Affirmed.
J. B Clark, of Inez, for appellant.
T. B McGregor, Atty. Gen., John W. Wheeler, of Paintsville, Jasper H. Preece, of Inez, and Lilburn Phelps, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.
Appellant was convicted of having in possession an illicit still, which is made a misdemeanor by section 4 of chapter 33 of the 1922 Acts.
For reversal, he insists that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the indictment and his motion for a directed acquittal.
The indictment charged appellant not only with having in his possession an illicit still, but also with operating same, and, upon the theory that for this reason the indictment was duplicitous, the commonwealth, before the demurrer was ruled upon, elected to prosecute appellant upon the charge of having an illicit still in his possession, which, under the Code and many decisions of this court, would have cured the defect in the indictment if it had been duplicitous. Section 168 of the Criminal Code; Cartwright v. Commonwealth, 196 Ky. 6, 244 S.W. 55.
But simply to operate an illicit still is not made an offense, and the allegations being insufficient to charge that the defendant was unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes, as denounced by section 1 of the chapter, supra, the indictment charged the single offense of having an illicit still in possession, and was not therefore demurrable, as the averment of operating same was merely surplusage. Stinnett v. Com., 200 Ky. 297, 254 S.W. 920.
The court, therefore, did not err in overruling the demurrer to the indictment.
Defendant's motion for a directed verdict was based upon the two contentions, that the evidence of his guilt, given by the sheriff, was incompetent because obtained by an illegal search, and that the other witness for the commonwealth, Herb Pack, was an accomplice, and his evidence of defendant's guilt, being unsupported by competent evidence, was insufficient to warrant a conviction.
There is, in our judgment, no merit in either contention. When the sheriff approached defendant and his companion, Herb Pack, as they were riding along the highway, the defendant fled, and the officer pursued him but...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Moore v. State
...Flum v. State, 141 N.E. 353; (1922). Callender v. State, 136 N.E. 10. 4. KENTUCKY. (1920). Youman v. Com., 224 S.W. 860; (1923). Davis v. Com., 256 S.W. 429; (1924). Cole Com., 257 S.W. 713. 5. MISSOURI. (1924). State v. Owens, 259 S.W. 100. 6. MONTANA. (1924). State ex rel. King v. Distric......
-
Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.
...should not be sustained on that ground. Section 168, Criminal Code of Practice; Cartwright v. Com., 196 Ky. 6, 244 S.W. 55; Davis v. Com., 201 Ky. 300, 256 S.W. 429; Hudson v. Com., 214 Ky. 578, 283 S.W. It is very clear that in the accusatory part of the indictment the appellee was charged......
-
Com. v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.
...should not be sustained on that ground. Section 168, Criminal Code of Practice; Cartwright v. Com., 196 Ky. 6, 244 S.W. 55; Davis v. Com., 201 Ky. 300, 256 S.W. 429; v. Com., 214 Ky. 578, 283 S.W. 1034. It is very clear that in the accusatory part of the indictment the appellee was charged ......
-
State v. Harris
...364 Mo. 247, 260 S.W.2d 736; State v. Egan, Mo.App., 272 S.W.2d 719; Johnson v. Commonwealth, 201 Ky. 163, 256 S.W. 18; Davis v. Commonwealth, 201 Ky. 300, 256 S.W. 429. Nor does an unlawful search and seizure take place where papers and effects siezed are open to the eye and hand. State v.......