Davis v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date02 December 1955
PartiesArch M. DAVIS et al., suing on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Leo T. Wolford, Louisville, for appellant.

Squire R. Ogden, Wm. H. Abell, Louisville, for appellee.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

This class action under the declaratory judgment statute, KRS, Chapter 418, was brought by the appellants, three stockholders of the Commonwealth Life Insurance Company, against the corporation and its president and secretary for the purpose of obtaining the rendition of a judgment declaring whether or not it is lawful to split up the corporate stock of the company into a greater number of shares. The proposed plan is to reduce the par value of the stock from $10 to $2 per share and to issue to the stockholders five new shares for each one now held by them. The proposal to increase the capital stock by $1,000,000 and declare a stock dividend is not involved.

The question submitted arises from a provision in the Insurance Code enacted by the General Assembly in 1950, Chapter 21, Acts of 1950 which is now Chapter 304 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, the particular provision being Sec. 304.121, subsection (2)(c). The circuit court declared the proposed action to be legal. We affirmed the judgment by an order of November 4, 1955, and took time to prepare the opinion.

The Commonwealth Life Insurance Company was organized under Kentucky law in May, 1904, with a capital stock of $1,500,000, divided into 150,000 shares of a par value of $10. In 1951 the capital stock was increased to $2,000,000 and the number of shares to 200,000. This was effected by transferring $500,000 from the surplus of the company and issuing a stock dividend. It appears that the company's current surplus is around $9,000,000, and the market value of each share of its stock is approximately $200.

By an appropriate resolution, already adopted, the Board of Directors will submit to the stockholders a proposition to amend the charter to increase the capital stock to $3,000,000. To accomplish that, it is proposed to convert each share of the $10 par value of outstanding stock into 5 shares of $2 par value and to declare a 50 per cent stock dividend on the converted shares so that one additional share will be received for each two shares of the reclassified stock. It is also proposed to pay a cash dividend upon the new stock.

It is conceded that the stockholders will accept the plan and authorize the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to conform unless it is declared illegal.

The proposed transactions and charter amendment are being proposed in the belief that the increased number of shareholders will be beneficial to the corporation's business and good will and advantageous to the stockholders in the creation of a wider market and greater demand for the shares of stock.

Before the adoption of the present Kentucky Insurance Code, which became effective September 1, 1950, the statutes relating to the organization of a life insurance company did not prescribe any minimum limitation on the par value of stock to be issued, although the amount of the capital stock and the number of shares had to be stated. Sec. 618, Kentucky Statutes; KRS 296.090, 1948 edition. KRS 304.121 now prescribes the requirements for the incorporation of domestic stock insurers additional to the applicable law governing the incorporation of business corporations generally. The pertinent subsection (2)(c) reads: 'Each share of capital stock shall have a par value of not less than ten dollars.' The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • B.L. v. Schuhmann
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • 2 Mayo 2019
    ...and citations omitted). And "[w]hat is not said may be of as much significance as what is said." Davis v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. , 284 S.W.2d 809, 810 (Ky. 1955).16 (5) "Human trafficking" is defined as "criminal activity whereby one (1) or more persons are subjected to engaging in: (a)......
  • Kentucky Indus. Utility Customers, Inc. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., s. 97-SC-1091-D
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • 17 Diciembre 1998
    ...Ky., 481 S.W.2d 279 (1972); Webster County Soil Conservation Dist. v. Shelton, Ky., 437 S.W.2d 934 (1969); Davis v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co., Ky., 284 S.W.2d 809 (1955); City of Covington v. Sohio Petroleum Co., Ky., 279 S.W.2d 746 (1955); ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Madisonville Reca......
  • County of Harlan v. Appalachian Healthcare, 2001-SC-0423-DG.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • 26 Septiembre 2002
    ...word or sentence is determinative, but the statute as a whole must be considered. Strong, supra; see also Davis v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co., Ky., 284 S.W.2d 809 (1955); Graham, supra. In order to effectuate the legislative intent, words may be supplied, omitted, substituted or modifi......
  • Holsclaw v. Stephens
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • 28 Diciembre 1973
    ...a cardinal rule of statutory construction that the chief purpose is to determine the legislative intent. In Davis v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Company, Ky., 284 S.W.2d 809 (1955), we said: '* * * It is elementary that in the construction of a statute the touchstone is the will or intent o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT