Davis v. Des Moines & Ft. D. R. Co.
Decision Date | 13 March 1912 |
Citation | 135 N.W. 356,155 Iowa 51 |
Parties | DAVIS ET AL. v. DES MOINES & FT. D. R. CO. ET AL. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, Polk County; Lawrence De Graff, Judge.
Suit in equity to enjoin defendants from using certain railway tracks over plaintiffs' land, except to reach a coal mine near plaintiffs' property. Defendants claim the right to use the tracks under the terms of a written lease and in virtue of certain condemnation proceedings instituted by the defendant Des Moines & Ft. Dodge Railroad Company. Plaintiffs say that the lease is not broad enough in its terms to cover the use being made of the tracks, and that, if it is, it should be so reformed as to give defendants nothing more than the privilege of hauling coal over the tracks, and that the condemnation proceedings are void, because instituted for a private purpose, and invalid, because in fact instituted by a private corporation, to wit, the cement company and for its individual use. An estoppel was also pleaded by defendants. On these issues, the case was tried to the court, resulting in a decree dismissing plaintiffs' petition, and they appeal. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.J. G. Myerly, for appellants.
Geo. W. Seevers, W. H. Bremner, and E. D. Samson, for appellees Des Moines & Ft. D. R. Co. and Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co.
Guernsey, Parker & Miller, for appellee Iowa Portland Cement Co.
In August of the year 1904, plaintiffs leased to George Simpson and Peter Reynolds the coal under about 57 acres of land owned by them, located in the southwestern part of the city of Des Moines. This lease was in writing, and, among other things, it granted the lessees the following:
This lease was assigned to the Hollingsworth Coal Company, which sunk a shaft on land adjoining that of plaintiffs on the west, and commenced taking coal from under plaintiffs' land some time in the year 1905, through the shaft just mentioned. The Hollingsworth Company assigned all its right, title, and interest in and to the right of way provided for in the lease to the Des Moines & Ft. Dodge Railroad Company, and the railroad company agreed, as part consideration for the assignment to build a railway to the shaft. The exact provision with reference to this railway was as follows:
Pursuant to this agreement, the railway built a track over plaintiffs' land, and also onto and upon the land of one Chas. Davis, which adjoined plaintiffs' land on the west. The railway track so constructed was used for the sole purpose of transporting coal from the shaft on the Chas. Davis land from the time of its construction down until the year 1910; and it is claimed that none of the parties to the original lease and none of the assignees thereof ever thought or understood that the right of way was other than a private one, created to facilitate the mining of coal from the plaintiffs' lands and those immediately adjacent thereto. It appears that in securing this right of way the original lessees represented that they wished it for the purpose of hauling coal from the shaft to a connection with a railway to the east of plaintiffs' land. The Iowa Portland Cement Company constructed a plant for the manufacture of cement, some time in the year 1909, upon some land southeast from that owned by plaintiffs, and in that year began the construction of a switch running east from and connecting with the coal road on plaintiffs' land, and in the following year completed the same, so that it had a track leading from its works over the switch constructed by the railway to a junction with a railway owned by one of the defendants. This switch or track was constructed by the cement company under a contract with the Des Moines & Ft. Dodge Railroad Company, from which we extract the following:
“Whereas, the railroad company owns and operates a spur track from Valley Junction, Iowa, to the coal mines of the Hollingsworth Coal Company, a short distance from Valley Junction, Iowa, and from the main line of the road of the railroad company; and whereas, the cement company owns real estate located near said spur track and is erecting thereon a plant for the manufacture of Portland Cement and desires to connect its said plant with the main line of said railroad company's railroad at Valley Junction by a spur track to the Hollingsworth Coal Company's said mine, so that cars can be moved to and from its said plant and the railroad company's main track and its connections; and whereas, the cement company has arranged with the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. for the transportation of rock and shale for the use of its manufacturing plant, and has agreed with the said Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company to provide at its own sole cost and expense spur or switch tracks connecting the cement plant at Des Moines with the lines of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., and allow the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. to have the free us of said spur or switch tracks in connection with the business of the cement company: It is therefore mutually agreed:
First. That the cement company shall locate, construct and maintain a single spur track from its said property and trackage thereon to connect with the said Hollingsworth spur track at the point indicated on the blue print attached hereto and made a part hereof, which connection shall be made under the supervision of the chief engineer of the railroad company and in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lippman v. Sears Roebuck & Co
...specified, any other use may be enjoined. Weinkrantz v. Southwestern Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 264 S.W. 550; Davis v. Des Moines & Ft. D. R. Co., 155 Iowa 51, 135 N.W. 356; Grinnell Bros. v. Asiuliewicz, 241 Mich. 186, 216 N.W. 388; Collins v. Truman, 223 Mo.App. 186, 14 S.W.2d However, ......
- Davis v. Des Moines & Ft. Dodge R. R. Co.