Davis v. Hall

Decision Date08 November 1996
Docket NumberA-C
Citation233 A.D.2d 906,649 N.Y.S.2d 546
PartiesPaul Vashawn DAVIS, Respondent, v. Damon HALL, Defendant, and Thrifty Rent-ar System, Inc., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Saperston and Day, P.C. by Molly McBride, Buffalo, for appellant.

Charles L. Davis, Buffalo, for respondent.

Before PINE, J.P., and FALLON, WESLEY, DAVIS and BOEHM, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Plaintiff sustained injuries while a passenger in a rental car driven by Damon Hall that was involved in an accident in the City of Buffalo. The car, which was owned by Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc. (defendant), had been rented in Virginia by Eric Johnson, who permitted plaintiff to drive the car to Buffalo. Plaintiff permitted Hall to drive the car in Buffalo. Pursuant to the rental agreement, only Johnson, his spouse or one who signed the agreement were authorized drivers. Neither plaintiff nor Hall signed the rental agreement.

Supreme Court properly determined that Hall was driving the vehicle with the constructive consent of defendant. "Public policy considerations dictate that persons injured by the negligence of a driver should have recourse to a financially responsible defendant. Thus, lessors of automobiles may not enforce restrictions on the use of the automobiles by the renter and thereby escape liability to a third person on the ground that the violation of the restriction removed the element of consent required by [Vehicle and Traffic Law s] 388 (see, MVAIC v. Continental Natl. Am. Group Co., 35 N.Y.2d 260, 265 [360 N.Y.S.2d 859, 319 N.E.2d 182]; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Dailey, 47 A.D.2d 375, 376 , affd 39 N.Y.2d 759 [384 N.Y.S.2d 776, 349 N.E.2d 876] )" (Wynn v. Middleton, 184 A.D.2d 1019, 1020, 584 N.Y.S.2d 684).

We conclude that the court erred, however, in granting that part of plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the third affirmative defense, which alleged that plaintiff contributed to his injuries by failing to wear a seat belt. Plaintiff, who was asleep in the front passenger's seat when the vehicle struck a light pole, testified that he did not recall whether he was wearing his seat belt. That proof is insufficient to establish, as a matter of law, that plaintiff was wearing his seat belt (see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).

We therefore modify the amended order by denying in part plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Aboud v. Budget Rent a Car Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 1 December 1998
    ...Nat'l American Group Co., 35 N.Y.2d 260, 264-65, 360 N.Y.S.2d 859, 862-63, 319 N.E.2d 182 (1974); Davis v. Hall, 233 A.D.2d 906, 907, 649 N.Y.S.2d 546, 547 (4th Dep't 1996). The New York statute has been interpreted to impose vicarious liability on automobile owners even where the accident ......
  • Zegarowicz v. Ripatti
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 5 October 2010
    ...N.E.2d 25; Ryan v. Sobolevsky, 4 A.D.3d 222, 772 N.Y.S.2d 310; Taughrin v. Rodriguez, 254 A.D.2d 735, 677 N.Y.S.2d 861; Davis v. Hall, 233 A.D.2d 906, 649 N.Y.S.2d 546; Sullivan v. Spandau, 186 A.D.2d 641, 589 N.Y.S.2d 49; see generally Jones v. Bill, 10 N.Y.3d 550, 553-555, 860 N.Y.S.2d 76......
  • Hannibal v. Kimbeni
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 24 December 2001
    ...Corp. v. Continental Natl. Amer. Group Co., 35 N.Y.2d 260, 265; see also, Allstate Ins. Co. v Travelers Ins. Co., 39 N.Y.2d 784; Davis v. Hall, 233 A.D.2d 906; ACP Servs. Corp. v. St. Paul Fire and Mar. Ins. Co., 224 A.D.2d 961; Tom Sawyer Country Day School v. Providence Washington Ins. Co......
  • Murdza v. D.L. Peterson Trust
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 6 June 2002
    ...recourse to a financially responsible defendant." Id. at 265, 319 N.E.2d at 185, 360 N.Y.S.2d at 863. See also Davis v. Hall, 233 A.D.2d 906, 649 N.Y.S.2d 546 (4th Dep't 1996) (Court concluded that Hall drove with "constructive consent" of defendant Thrifty Rent a Car, where Thrifty rented ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter § 3.04 RENTAL CARS
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Travel Law
    • Invalid date
    ...law "only places a burden on rental can companies to accept facially valid, unexpired driver's licenses"). New York: Davis v. Hall, 649 N.Y.S.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996) (rental car accident; driver who did not sign rental car agreement held to have constructive consent of rental car compa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT