Davis v. Holloway, 32705
Decision Date | 10 March 1950 |
Docket Number | No. 32705,No. 2,32705,2 |
Citation | 58 S.E.2d 234,81 Ga.App. 158 |
Parties | DAVIS v. HOLLOWAY |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
The petition did not set forth a cause of action and the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer thereto.
J. Cecil Davis brought an action against Charles W. Holloway, as permanent administrator of the estate of John H. Holloway, deceased, in which he alleged substantially the following: John H. Holloway, late of Baldwin County, died on January 25, 1947; thereafter Charles W. Holloway was appointed permanent administrator of the estate of John H. Holloway by the Court of Ordinary of Baldwin County; more than one year has elapsed since the appointment of the permanent administrator; prior to the death of John H. Holloway, he and the plaintiff were partners in a certain business conducted in the city of Milledgeville, Baldwin County, Georgia, known as 'Holloway's'; the said John H. Holloway owned sixty per cent interest in the business and the plaintiff owned forty per cent interest; shortly after the death of John H. Holloway and the dissolution of the partnership effected thereby, and on February 28, 1947, the plaintiff purchased from the estate and heirs of John H. Holloway the sixty per cent undivided interest of John H. Holloway in the partnership; that the books of the partnership were thereupon examined and disclosed that John H. Holloway had withdrawn from the partnership a considerable sum of money in excess of sixty per cent of the net earnings thereof, resulting in an indebtedness to the plaintiff of the sum of $3,499.19 with interest at the rate of 7 per cent from January 25, 1947. By amendment this figure was changed to $3,729.61, and the following allegations were added: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
J. C. Penney Co., Inc. v. West, 52752
...that no one ought to unjustly enrich himself at the expense of another, and it is a substitute for a suit in equity. Davis v. Holloway, 81 Ga.App. 158, 58 S.E.2d 234. It is the appropriate remedy where one wrongfully receives and retains the money of another. Dell v. Kugel, 99 Ga.App. 551, ......
-
Peerless Casualty Company v. Housing Authority
...facts of the several cases, denied relief from mistakes caused by carelessness, ignorance or lack of diligence. Davis v. Holloway, 81 Ga.App. 158, 58 S.E.2d 234; Adler v. Leopold Adler Co., 205 Ga. 818, 55 S.E.2d 139; Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Gortatowsky, 123 Ga. 366, 51 S.E. 469; Keith......
- Hartley v. Strowbridge