Davis v. Rigsby, 314
Decision Date | 29 April 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 314,314 |
Citation | 136 S.E.2d 33,261 N.C. 684 |
Parties | Charles DAVIS, by his Next Friend, Robert Allen, v. William RIGSBY. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
A. E. Leake, Marshall, for plaintiff.
Williams, Williams & Morris, Asheville, for defendant.
The basis of defendant's appeal is his contention that plaintiff's evidence establishes his contributory negligence as a matter of law.Plaintiff's argument is that, notwithstanding his own testimony to the contrary, he offered defendant's testimony that he had drunk no intoxicants that night and that this conflict in the evidence was for the jury to resolve.Ordinarily this would be true, but plaintiff overlooks the positive allegation in his complaint that at the time of the accident defendant was operating his automobile while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage thereby proximately causing the upset.A party is bound by his pleadings and, unless withdrawn, amended, or otherwise altered, the allegations contained in all pleadings ordinarily are conclusive as against the pleader.He cannot subsequently take a position contradictory to his pleadings.Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. Saunders, 235 N.C. 369, 70 S.E.2d 176;71 C.J.S.Pleading§ 59.Therefore, so far as plaintiff's right of action is concerned, his allegation that defendant was under the influence of an intoxicant at the time of the accident is conclusive and any evidence to the contrary must be disregarded in passing on the motion for nonsuit.
It is negligence per se for one to operate an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant within the meaning of G.S. § 20-138.Watters v. Parrish, 252 N.C. 787, 115 S.E.2d 1.If one enters an automobile with knowledge that the driver is under the influence of an intoxicant and voluntarily rides with him, he is guilty of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Shepard v. Bonita Vista Properties, L.P.
...are conclusive as against the pleader. He cannot subsequently take a position contradictory to his pleadings." Davis v. Rigsby, 261 N.C. 684, 686, 136 S.E.2d 33, 34 (1964). Our Supreme Court has also stated: "It is axiomatic with us that a litigant must be heard here on the theory of the tr......
-
Cananwill, Inc. v. EMAR Group, Inc.
...otherwise altered, the allegations contained in all pleadings ordinarily are conclusive as against the pleader." Davis v. Rigsby, 261 N.C. 684, 686, 136 S.E.2d 33, 34 (1964). "The effect of a judicial admission is to establish the fact for the purposes of the case and to eliminate it entire......
-
North Carolina State Bar v. DuMont
...and may not thereafter take a position contrary thereto. Watson v. Clutts, 262 N.C. 153, 136 S.E.2d 617 (1964); Davis v. Rigsby, 261 N.C. 684, 136 S.E.2d 33 (1964). Respondent cannot now challenge the applicability of the 1975 statute to this Regardless of the foregoing, we hold that the 19......
-
Fuller v. Wake Cnty.
...altered, the allegations contained in all pleadings ordinarily are conclusive as against the pleader.’ " (quoting Davis v. Rigsby , 261 N.C. 684, 686, 136 S.E.2d 33, 34 (1964) ). Nor did Fuller move the court to order a separate trial of any non-tort claim. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule ......
-
Chapter 17 DRAM SHOP ACT VIOLATIONS
...caused plaintiff's injuries constituting contributory negligence as matter of law).[10] N.C.G.S. § 20-138.1(a).[11] Davis v. Rigsby, 261 N.C. 684, 136 S.E.2d 33 (1964) (it is negligence per se for one to operate automobile while under influence of intoxicant as statutorily defined). See als......