Davis v. State

Decision Date12 November 1942
Docket Number29639.
Citation22 S.E.2d 762,68 Ga.App. 296
PartiesDAVIS v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

The evidence of Eddie Lane in part was as follows: "I knew Jesse Evans Junior [the deceased]. I have known him about four years. *** I know the defendant on trial. I was with Jesse Evans junior during the night of November 3, 1941. I was with him about 6:15 p.m., in the evening. I know where the defendant, James Davis, was living at that time. Me and Jesse Evans [the deceased] went some place that night. We went over to Red's [the defendant]. We went over there to lay around and see where did he keep his whisky in the grass and if we could we were going to barrel him for about five or ten, we were going to get it, but if we could see where he kept his whisky and he locked it in the house, we were going to call the police and let them get it. If he had it in the grass we were going to steal it. That is what I mean when I say barrel it. We got over there in the neighborhood of where the defendant lived about twenty minutes until seven o'clock. When we got over there we got under the house next to Red's house. We got up under the house next to the house where this defendant lived. As to how far that house was from the defendant's house--about that far [indicating], like this was Mr. Red's house and this was the other house. I would say it was about four feet between the two houses. Jesse Evans junior and I stayed under that house about fifteen minutes. When that car drove up in Red's back yard, the defendant's back yard, it rolled up and Red walked out to the car and he looked back and seen me and so I told Jesse, 'Let's go."'

"Q. Well, now, where were you boys at that time? A. Up under the house.

"Q. Next door? A. Yes, sir. After I spoke to Jesse Evans I came out from under the house in front of him and started around the house that way. He came out behind me, and the defendant turned around and run like this after a pistol. *** I heard James Davis say, 'Halt,' before he started shooting." On cross examination this witness stated "We went over there for the purpose of stealing. We were just waiting for a chance to steal. He ordered us to halt and we didn't do it."

Eddie Lane testified that the deceased was going away from the defendant at the time he was shot. In seeming contradiction of such testimony, Marcellus Thornton, a State's witness and a funeral director and embalmer who handled the body of the deceased, testified: "I found a gunshot wound in his right side right below the right breast, right under the arm. That wound was right there (indicating). That was a pistol wound." On cross-examination he testified, "The wound was right there, right under the right breast. It was right under the right breast under the arm. If the arm was being held down by the side that wound could not have been inflicted. He must have had his arm up. He could have had it up like that, too." Will Lackey, a witness for the defendant, testified that, on the Saturday night preceding the shooting on Monday, the defendant's coal house (underneath his house) had been broken into, and that he had seen the lock exhibited to him and that the lock was on the coal-house door and in a broken condition. Anderson Edwards, a witness for the defendant, testified that the deceased "run backwards and began to shoot, and he shot three or four times, and this man at the corner of the old pillar, [the defendant] he shot one time, and that settled the shooting." The defendant in his statement to the jury stated: "On the night of Saturday night before the 3rd of November, someone broke in my coal house. I got chickens out there and coal, and I had a lot of tools in there where I do carpenter work, paint brushes and things. So that Sunday I laid for somebody to come back. They didn't come. So Monday I bought another lock and put on there. Monday night I heard a noise out in the back yard. When I come around the house and come in the yard I seen these two fellows and I hollered, 'Halt,' and when I hollered 'Halt' one flashed a light and the other one started to shooting. Well, when he started to shoot I shot back, and when I heard one say, 'I am shot,' I walked up the street."

The jury manifestly believed those phases of the State's evidence that authorize a conviction of voluntary manslaughter, rather than the defendant's evidence and his statement which would have authorized an acquittal. This they were permitted to do.

The judge did not err in overruling the motion...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Hogan v. City-County Hospital of LaGrange
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 12, 1976
    ...evidence' to support the verdict, the same shall be upheld despite the fact that there may be conflicting evidence. See Davis v. State, 68 Ga.App. 296(2), 22 S.E.2d 762; McBowman v. Merry, 104 Ga.App. 454(1), 456, 122 S.E.2d 136.' Allen v. State, 137 Ga.App. 21, 222 S.E.2d Upon applying the......
  • Starr v. State, 50157
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 4, 1975
    ...a homicide is neither justificable nor malicious, it is manslaughter, and if intentional, it is voluntary manslaughter. Davis v. State, 68 Ga.App. 296(2), 22 S.E.2d 762; Spradlin v. State, 90 Ga.App. 97, 103, 82 S.E.2d 238; Gainey v. State, 132 Ga.App. 870(1), 209 S.E.2d 687. There was no e......
  • Shields v. State, 55975
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 6, 1978
    ...a homicide is " 'neither justifiable nor malicious, it is manslaughter, and, if intentional, is voluntary manslaughter. Davis v. State,68 Ga.App. 296(2), 22 S.E.2d 762'." Gainey v. State, 132 Ga.App. 870(1), 209 S.E.2d 687; Spradlin v. State, 90 Ga.App. 97, 103, 82 S.E.2d 238. The charge is......
  • Spradlin v. State, 35135
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 22, 1954
    ...a homicide is neither justifiable nor malicious, it is manslaughter, and, if intentional, is voluntary manslaughter. Davis v. State, 68 Ga.App. 296(3) 22 S.E.2d 762. If one seeks an interview with another for the purpose of mutual combat with deadly weapons, his crime is murder or voluntary......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT