Davis v. State, 6 Div. 481
Decision Date | 25 September 1973 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 481 |
Citation | 283 So.2d 650,51 Ala.App. 200 |
Parties | Mose Jefferson DAVIS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
E. C. Herrin, Birmingham, for appellant.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Donald G. Valeska, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was indicted for first degree murder. He was found guilty by a jury of first degree manslaughter and his punishment was fixed at ten years in the penitentiary.
The State's evidence tends to establish the following facts:
On June 19, 1971, appellant went to the home of Frank Felton, the deceased. The appellant and Felton began to argue concerning appellant's visit. As the argument progressed, the appellant, while standing on the front porch of Felton's home, took a knife from his pocket and opened the blade. Felton then went into the house, got an iron skillet, and threw it at the appellant. After Felton threw the skillet, the appellant threatened to kill him. Felton then went back out and argued with the appellant. A neighbor, Joe Sawyer, appeared and tried to end the argument but left before any blows were struck. Felton returned to his home and went to the back porch where he and the appellant continued to argue. A neighbor, Linda Sanders, testified that she saw the appellant step up and stab Felton in the chest as he turned to go into the house. Ruby L. Felton, with whom the appellant had been living for six years, testified that she heard the argument stop and immediately went to the back of the house to see what had happened. She stated that Felton came in the back door and told her that the appellant had cut him.
Appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error in permitting Ruby Felton to testify that the deceased accused appellant of having stabbed him. The thrust of appellant's argument is that the accusation was a dying declaration and that the State failed to lay the proper predicate. We are of the opinion that the decedent's declaration was properly admitted as a startled utterance or spontaneous declaration. The record clearly shows that the accusation was a part of the res gestae of the difficulty. Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 503, 27 So.2d 512; Hutchinson v. State, 15 Ala.App. 96, 72 So. 572.
Nelson v. State, 130 Ala. 83, 30 So. 728, is pertinent to the case at bar. There, the Court said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones v. State
...surrounding her daughter's death had no effect whatsoever upon her ability to reach a fair and true verdict). Cf. Davis v. State, 51 Ala.App. 200, 283 So.2d 650 (1973)(where the precise question was whether the veniremember or the veniremember's spouse had been in law enforcement, the juror......
-
Tomlin v. State
...responses to questioning in a judicial forum. questions apply to any one the veniremember is close to. Compare Davis v. State, 51 Ala.App. 200, 283 So.2d 650 (1973) (where the precise question was whether the veniremember or the veniremember's spouse had been in law enforcement, the juror h......
-
Harris v. State
...at any time after the murders; therefore, she did not commit misconduct by failing to disclose that information. See Davis v. State, 283 So. 2d 650, 652 (Ala. Crim. App. 1973) (holding that '[v]eniremen cannot be expected to reveal information not elicited by the litigants.'). ..."[R.J.] ad......
-
Parish v. State, 8 Div. 258
...Flurry v. State, 52 Ala.App. 64, 289 So.2d 632 (1973), cert. denied, 292 Ala. 720, 289 So.2d 644 (1974). 1 In Davis v. State, 51 Ala.App. 200, 283 So.2d 650 (1973), the lower court denied the appellant's motion for mistrial predicated upon the failure of a prospective juror to reveal certai......