Davis v. State
Decision Date | 20 January 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 45144,45144 |
Citation | 218 So.2d 17 |
Parties | Thomas A. DAVIS v. STATE of Mississippi. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
W. D. Kendall, W. S. Moore, Jackson, for appellant.
Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Laurence Y. Mellen, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Thomas A. Davis was indicted for and convicted of the crime of burglary in the Circuit Court of Newton County and was sentenced to seven years in the state penitenitary.
The indictment charged that Tom A. Davis, Oneal Buddy Goodman, and others broke into the Hickory Branch Office of the Newton County Bank during the early morning hours of March 16, 1968, and stole money of the United States therefrom.
The Appellant, Davis, was arrested on March 23, appellant and Co-defendant Goodman arraigned on March 25, severance granted Davis on that day, and Appellant Davis was tried on March 29, 1968.
The six assignments of error make two contentions only:
1. The trial court did not provide counsel for the accused, Davis, a fair opportunity for interviewing Oneal Buddy Goodman; and
2. The appellant was indicted by a grand jury and convicted by a petit jury on which there were no women, women being excluded by statute.
Oneal Buddy Goodman was a co-defendant of the appellant. He pleaded guilty prior to the trial of appellant and was placed back in the City Jail to await sentencing.
About 6:30 p.m. on March 28, 1968, the eve of the trial of appellant, W. D. Kendall, one of the appellant's attorneys, went to the City Jail at Newton, Mississippi, and attempted to see Buddy Goodman. He was informed by the district attorney that the circuit judge had given orders that no one except the district attorney, county attorney, and court-appointed counsel for Goodman, co-defendant, could see Goodman without written orders from the judge.
The next day, March 29, after Goodman had testified for the State, W. D. Kendall, of counsel for Appellant Davis, moved for a continuance until appellant could prepare a defense to the testimony of Goodman. Kendall took the witness stand and was cross-examined by the district attorney. He admitted that he knew that Goodman was a co-defendant, that he had made no effort to subpoena and had not subpoenaed Goodman as a witness, that he had made no request to the district attorney to see, talk with, or interview Goodman until the night before the trial, and no request had ever been made to the circuit judge.
In overruling the motion for a continuance, the trial court stated:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Scott v. State
...conference was recognized. In a number of cases we have upheld reasonable limitations on the right to confer with witnesses. Davis v. State, 218 So.2d 17 (Miss.1969), cert. denied 395 U.S. 949, 89 S.Ct. 2032, 23 L.Ed.2d 469 (Miss.1969); Cannon v. State, 190 So.2d 848 (Miss.1966) (defense co......