Davis v. State, CR
| Decision Date | 13 June 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. CR,CR |
| Citation | 317 Ark. 322,877 S.W.2d 93 |
| Parties | Roy E. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee, 94-521. |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Dana Reece, Little Rock, for appellant.
J. Winston Bryant, Atty. Gen., Pamela Rumpz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
The State asks that Roy E. Davis be permitted to file a belated appeal pursuant to an order rendered by United States District Judge Henry Woods, stating that he would issue a writ of habeas corpus on Davis' behalf unless the State of Arkansas grants Davis' motion for belated appeal.
Davis was charged in the Pulaski County Circuit Court with first degree murder and found guilty. He was represented by retained counsel, Ralph Cloar. As a result, the trial Judge, Floyd Lofton, made the following docket entries on his Register of Actions:
2/28/88 Jury returned at 5:15 p.m. and assessed punishment at life in Dept. of Correction--Passed to 4/28/88 for notice of intent to appeal. Def. is indigent.
3/28/88 No notice of intent to appeal--Cloar did not appear--Df. is in A.D.C.--case closed.
The record is silent as to other proceedings at trial level other than a notation in the register dated August 28, 1990, that: "order denying post conviction relief mailed." The record does not reflect a formal judgment by the trial court, nor does it reflect a notice of appeal or an order relieving Mr. Cloar as counsel.
Thereafter, Davis filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court. The U.S. Magistrate found that Davis had not received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his undisputed wish to appeal, and that, Mr. Cloar, as Davis' unrelieved counsel, remained responsible for representing Davis or ensuring that the public defender did so. Pursuant to these findings, the Magistrate Judge concluded that a writ of habeas corpus issue unless the State of Arkansas grants Davis' motion for belated appeal. The United States District Judge adopted the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and disposition in an order entered April 13, 1994.
We concur in the view that, under the circumstances, attorney Cloar's failure to file a notice of appeal should not deprive Davis of his right to appeal and that Davis is entitled to a belated appeal and that the failure to perfect the appeal is attributable to Mr. Cloar, Davis' attorney of record, since he had not been relieved as Davis' counsel. Rule 36.26 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Long
...clause is ambiguous such that the ambiguity is an issue for the fact finder. See Curley , 155 S.W.3d at 713 ; see also Keller , 877 S.W.2d at 93.State Farm argues that, "[a]s the purpose of Mr. Long's operation of the QX56 at the time of the accident was to service and transport the vehicle......
-
Davis v. State
...Justice. This court previously granted a motion for belated appeal filed by appellant, Roy Eldridge Davis. Davis v. State, 317 Ark. 322, 877 S.W.2d 93 (1994) (per curiam). Thus, appellant appeals a judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court entered in 1988 pursuant to a jury verdict convi......
-
Wood v. Tyler
... ... 54(d): ... (d) Costs. Except when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of this state or in these rules, costs shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise directs ... The Reporter's ... ...
- Brown v. City of Bryant