Davis v. Town of Southern Pines
| Decision Date | 02 March 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 598P94,598P94 |
| Citation | 454 S.E.2d 648,339 N.C. 737 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Amanda DAVIS v. TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES; Chris Vandereit, Individually and in his official capacity; Stanley Klingenschmidt, Individually and in his official capacity. |
H. Lee Evans, Jr., Kari L. Russwurm, Raleigh, for Town of Southern Pines, et al.
Charles M. Putterman, Raleigh, for Davis.
Prior report: 116 N.C.App. 663, 449 S.E.2d 240.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 1995."
To continue reading
Request your trial
40 cases
-
Moore v. Evans
...appealable. See, e.g., Davis v. Town of Southern Pines, 116 N.C.App. 663, 449 S.E.2d 240 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 737, 454 S.E.2d 648 (1995); Herndon v. Barrett, 101 N.C.App. 636, 400 S.E.2d 767 (1991); Corum v. University of North Carolina, 97 N.C.App. 527, 389 S.E.2d 596, aff......
-
Davis v. Messer
...omitted); see also Davis v. Town of Southern Pines, 116 N.C.App. 663, 673-74, 449 S.E.2d 240, 246 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 737, 454 S.E.2d 648 (1995). Governmental activities have been described as those which promote the "health, safety, security or general welfare of its citi......
-
Wilcox v. City of Asheville
...(1994) (emphasis added) (quoting Corum v. Univ. of N.C., 330 N.C. 761, 782, 413 S.E.2d 276, 289 (1992)), disc. review denied,339 N.C. 737, 454 S.E.2d 648 (1995). In Glenn–Robinson v. Acker, 140 N.C.App. 606, 538 S.E.2d 601 (2000), appeal dismissed, disc. review denied,353 N.C. 372, 547 S.E.......
-
Barnett v. Karpinos
...(citations omitted). Davis v. Town of Southern Pines, 116 N.C.App. 663, 670, 449 S.E.2d 240, 244 (1994), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 737, 454 S.E.2d 648 (1995). The specific right allegedly violated in this case is plaintiffs' right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. There i......
Request a trial to view additional results