Dawson v. State
Decision Date | 06 December 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 1328,1328 |
Citation | 40 Md.App. 640,395 A.2d 160 |
Parties | Betty Davis DAWSON v. STATE of Maryland. |
Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
Paul T. Stein and David E. Aaronson, Assigned Public Defenders, for appellant.
Arrie W. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom were Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., Andrew L. Sonner, State's Atty. for Montgomery County, and Paul Argued before MASON, LISS and MacDANIEL, JJ.
F. Kemp, Asst. State's Atty. for Montgomery County, on the brief, for appellee.
Betty Davis Dawson, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of manslaughter and use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence. She admits killing the victim, but contends it was in self-defense.
According to the evidence adduced at trial, on the evening of 2 June 1977 appellant and Ray Dawson, her ex-husband with whom she had resumed living, became involved in a heated argument. When Dawson indicated he was going out appellant attempted to stop him by twisting and bending the metal license plates on his car with her bare hands. Apparently angered by this, Dawson knocked appellant to the ground and drove off. After having a couple of drinks, appellant obtained a ride with Diane Aubinoe to the Summit Apartments in Rockville to look for her husband. On arriving at this apartment complex they rode around until Dawson's car was seen. Appellant and Diane got out of the car and approached two people sitting in lawn chairs drinking beer. Upon recognizing Dawson as one of the persons, appellant inquired, "what in the hell are you doing here?" to which he answered, "none of your damn business." Appellant then smacked him across the face, whereupon he retaliated by hitting her a number of times and, according to Diane, "fought her like a man." During the fight Margaret Bress, the victim, remained seated in the other lawn chair as if nothing were happening. During the melee, appellant leaped on top of Mrs. Bress and wrapped her arms around Mrs. Bress's neck. Dawson, however, pulled her off and continued striking her. Diane indicated that she did not join the fight because appellant was doing a pretty good job of defending herself, and Dawson was getting the worst of it. Eventually, Dawson walked away and Mrs. Bress went into her apartment and closed the sliding door to the patio. Appellant then banged on the door several times and yelled, "open the According to appellant, when Mrs. Bress opened the door she had a knife in her hand. "I asked her to come out, I would like to talk to her" and she said: "No, I am not coming no damn place." Mrs. Bress swung the knife in front of her and said, "she would cut my damn guts out." She became frightened and reached in her pocket book and pulled her gun out. When Mrs. Bress stepped toward her again swinging the knife, "I touched the trigger just a little too hard, I guess, and it went off." After the shooting she put the gun in her pocket book and walked to the parking lot where she was stopped by Mr. Papadopoulas, a tenant who lived in the apartment above the victim.
door bitch." Soon thereafter, Mrs. Bress opened the patio door and apparently stood in the doorway.
The State's version of the incident, as testified to by the victim's husband and children who were in the apartment, was that the victim did not have a knife and that she was shot immediately after opening the door. There is nothing in the record to show that the victim left her apartment prior to the shooting, or that the appellant attempted to enter it.
On appeal appellant contends (1) that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury on the issue of self-defense; (2) that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the gun seized from a pocketbook during a warrantless search; (3) that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress a series of statements taken while she was in custody.
The trial judge's instructions to the jury regarding self-defense were as follows:
"The defendant has raised the issue of self-defense, that is, legal justification. In order to justify the crime charged on the basis of self-defense, the defendant must have had reasonable grounds to believe, and must have, in "You must determine whether the defendant was justified in meeting force with force. If you find such justification, the force used against another must not have been unreasonable or excessive. There must not have been used more force than the exigency reasonably demanded. One is not entitled to use any greater force that he or she has reasonable grounds to believe, and actually did believe, to be necessary under the circumstances to save her life or to avert serious bodily injury.
fact, believed herself to be in apparent, imminent or immediate danger of bodily harm from her assailant or potential assailant. The circumstances under which the defendant acted must have been such as to produce in the mind of a reasonably prudent person, similarly situated, the reasonable belief that the other person was about to kill her or to do her serious bodily harm.
retreat, 1 but if you are the aggressor, even with this limited intent going in, then the law says that you must retreat if there is a reasonably available area of retreat for you and if time and circumstances permit the retreat, and if you don't retreat and you use fatal force, then you may be guilty of manslaughter.
Appellant did not take exception to the Court's charge, but requested additional instructions which were denied. The narrow issue then is whether the Court committed reversible error in refusing to give appellant's requested instructions:
'You are instructed that where one attacks another in a manner not contemplated to kill or Appellant's right to the proposed instructions is premised on the theory that even if she were the initial aggressor using non-deadly force she became the defender when the victim counter-attacked with deadly force, I. e., a knife. As support for this theory she relies on Tipton v. State, 1 Md.App. 556, 232 A.2d 289 (1967). In that case the father of an armless boy, who was the apparent aggressor in an affray, shot and killed the assailant who was about to strike his son on the head with a rock. In reversing the conviction this Court stated:
to do serious bodily harm, and the other counter-attacks using excessive and unreasonable force in a manner reasonably contemplated to cause death or great bodily harm, then the original attacker becomes the defender. If there is no obviously safe place of safety available, the defendant may then use whatever force necessary to repeal the counter-attack of the original defender.' "
The law regarding the duty of an aggressor to retreat is explicitly set forth in R. M. Perkins, Criminal Law, § 4.1, 1005-06 (2 ed. 1969):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Garcia
...577 (1978) (warrantless search of luggage seized incident to lawful custodial arrest reasonable under circumstances); Dawson v. State, 40 Md.App. 640, 395 A.2d 160 (1978) (warrantless search of purse justified as incident to arrest); Cooper v. Commonwealth, Ky.App., 577 S.W.2d 34 (1979) (wa......
-
People v. Boff
...person." See Hinkel v. Anchorage, 618 P.2d 1069 (Alaska 1980); Parris v. State, 270 Ark. 269, 604 S.W.2d 582 (1980); Dawson v. State, 40 Md.App. 640, 395 A.2d 160 (1978); State v. Horton, 44 N.C. App. 343, 260 S.E.2d 780 (1979); Carrasco v. State, 712 S.W.2d 120 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); see als......
-
State v. Caraher
...a jail. U.S. v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 94 S.Ct. 1234, 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974)." 266 Ark. at 719, 587 S.W.2d at 577. In Dawson v. State, 40 Md.App. 640, 395 A.2d 160 (1978) the defendant Betty Dawson was convicted of manslaughter. When a policeman arrived upon the scene he seized and searched ......
-
People v. Mannozzi
...(1979), 266 Ark. 709, 587 S.W.2d 571; State v. Sabater (1979), 3 Kan.App.2d 692, 694, 601 P.2d 11, 13-14; Dawson v. State (1978), 40 Md.App. 640, 647-54, 395 A.2d 160, 164-67; Stewart v. State (Tex.Crim.App.1981), 611 S.W.2d 434, 438.) Considering the delay of only 10 minutes and the person......