Day v. Amini, 89-00136
| Decision Date | 20 October 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-00136,89-00136 |
| Citation | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2489,550 So.2d 169 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2489 David DAY and Julia Day, Appellants, v. Rashid AMINI and H. Javier Castano, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Daren Shippy of Batchelor and Shippy, P.A., Bonita Springs, for appellants.
Jeffrey C. Quinn of Sparkman, Erickson & Quinn, P.A., Naples, for appellees.
Appellants/Defendants David and Julia Day challenge a judgment in favor of Appellees/Plaintiffs Rashid Amini and H. Javier Castano. We find merit only in Appellant Julia Day's argument that the court erred in denying her motion for involuntary dismissal at the close of plaintiffs' case.
In their amended complaint, Amini and Castano sought reimbursement for improvements made to the cocktail lounge in Naples, Florida, operated by David Day, and to recover their investment in a liquor inventory. The evidence in the nonjury trial revealed that in January 1987, Amini and Castano discussed operating the lounge with David Day. David Day's wife, Julia Day, was present when the parties reached a verbal agreement, whereby David Day would purchase the liquor and be reimbursed by Amini and Castano. The lounge would continue to operate under David Day's liquor license. Although the parties never entered into a written contract, Amini and Castano continued to operate the lounge, paying David Day for the liquor inventory and making numerous improvements to the lounge. In April 1987, the parties had a disagreement which culminated in David Day's locking Amini and Castano out of the lounge.
At the conclusion of the trial, the court found that Amini and Castano were entitled to recover, having proved conversion by and unjust enrichment of the Days. The court entered a final judgment against David and Julia Day for $9,545.30 plus costs, and this appeal ensued.
Of the points raised by the Days on appeal, only the point raised by Julia Day has merit. At the close of the plaintiffs' case, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b), the Days moved for involuntary dismissal of the claims against each of them. The court denied their motions. The Days then presented their case and at the close of all the evidence renewed their motions for involuntary dismissal. Again, the court denied the motions. We conclude that the court erred in denying the motion made on behalf of Julia Day.
A motion for involuntary dismissal pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b), which is used in nonjury trials, was formerly known as a motion for directed verdict, and the same law is applicable. Curls v. Tew, 346 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). In making the motion, the movant admits the truth of all facts in evidence and every reasonable conclusion or inference based thereon favorable to the non-moving party. See Hartnett v. Fowler, 94 So.2d 724 (Fla.1957). Where the plaintiff has presented a prima facie case and different conclusions or inferences can be drawn from the evidence, the trial judge should not grant a motion for involuntary dismissal. Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972). However, where the evidence offered by the plaintiffs, considered in the light most favorable to them, does not establish a prima facie case, it is incumbent on the trial judge to grant the motion. See Greenberg v. Post, 155 Fla. 135, 19 So.2d 714 (1944) (en...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tracey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
...for involuntary dismissal." Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Kummer, 195 So.3d 1173, 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (quoting Day v. Amini, 550 So.2d 169, 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) ).12 Accordingly, it is a failure of proof, not merely an erroneous ruling from the trial court, that warrants the involunt......
-
Mace v. M&T Bank
...Nat'l Tr. Co. ex rel. Harborview Mortg. Loan Tr. 2006-8 v. Kummer, 195 So. 3d 1173, 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (quoting Day v. Amini, 550 So. 2d 169, 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) ); see also Bayview Loan Servicing, 208 So. 3d at 98 ("An involuntary dismissal or directed verdict is properly entered o......
-
U.S. v. Bailey
...(Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (accord); Ginsberg v. Lennar Fla. Holdings, Inc., 645 So.2d 490, 500 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1994) (accord); Day v. Amini, 550 So.2d 169, 171 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1989) (accord); Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Crain Press, Inc., 481 So.2d 501, 503 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1985), rev. denied, 491 So.2d 278......
-
Bookworld Trade v. Daughters of St. Paul, Inc.
...occurs when "a person, with a right to possess property demands its return and the demand is, not or cannot be met." Day v. Amini, 550 So.2d 169, 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The tort of conversion does not require a showing of specific wrongful intent. City of Cars, Inc. v. Simms, 526 So.2d 119......
-
Chapter 13-6 Motions for Involuntary Dismissal
...adjudication on the merits unless the trial court order indicates otherwise.87--------Notes:[83] Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b); Day v. Amini, 550 So. 2d 169, 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).[84] Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b).[85] Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1972) ("We hold that a trial judge canno......
-
Chapter 13-6 Motions for Involuntary Dismissal
...adjudication on the merits unless the trial court order indicates otherwise.89--------Notes:[85] Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b); Day v. Amini, 550 So. 2d 169, 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).[86] Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b).[87] Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1972) ("We hold that a trial judge canno......