O'Day v. O'Day
Decision Date | 31 January 1906 |
Citation | 91 S.W. 921,193 Mo. 62 |
Parties | O'DAY et al. v. O'DAY et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; James T. Neville, Judge.
Action by Sue I. B. O'Day and E. W. Banister, executor of John O'Day, deceased, against John O'Day and others. From the judgment rendered, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Delaney & Delaney and E. W. Banister, for appellants. Tatlow & Mitchell and J. T. White, for respondents.
John O'Day on the 8th day of June, 1901, executed his last will, and the plaintiffs herein were appointed therein to execute said will. This suit is for the purpose of having said will construed, and it was filed in the circuit court of Greene county, Mo., on the __ day of August, 1902, by said Sue I. B. O'Day and said E. W. Banister, and John Baldwin O'Day, Catherine O'Day, and Thomas K. O'Day, infants, and children of the marriage of deceased testator with Sue I. B. O'Day, were made parties defendant. John O'Day and A. C. O'Day, children by a former marriage, were also joined as defendants. After the institution of the suit, at her personal request, Sue I. B. O'Day was also made a party defendant. The infants, John Baldwin O'Day, Catherine O'Day, and Thomas K. O' Day, were duly served with process, and T. J. Delaney was thereupon appointed guardian ad litem for said infant defendants. It being apparent to said T. J. Delaney that a conflict of interest might arise between said John Baldwin O'Day and Catherine O'Day named in the will, on the one side, and the posthumous child, T. K. O'Day, on the other, the appointment of said T. J. Delaney as guardian ad litem for Thomas K. O'Day was, at his own suggestion, set aside, and J. T. White, Esq., was appointed guardian in his stead. The testator died seised of a number of tracts of real estate and possessed of a large amount of money and notes.
Only such parts of the will as seem to be necessary to a proper understanding and solution of the questions involved in this suit will be recited, and such are as follows:
By the seventh clause of said will it is provided as follows:
By the will specific devises of real estate were made to Sue I. B. O'Day and to her two children then living, and specific devises were also made to John O'Day and A. C. O'Day, children aforesaid, but no provision whatever was made for the posthumous child, nor was any reference made to said child in the will.
The testator died seised of a large number of tracts of real estate not specifically devised, and died possessed of $55,131.40 in cash, which sum was on deposit in his name in the bank of the Holland Banking Company, also possessed of 32 bonds of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, also the sum of $31,669.93, which was on deposit in the National Exchange Bank, also a large amount of notes of the face value of about $260,000, and other personal property. The $55,131.40 on deposit with the Holland Banking Company was the proceeds of the $43,775 bonds of the St....
To continue reading
Request your trial- Humphreys v. Welling, 34954.
-
Barnhardt v. McGrew
...alone. 28 R.C.L. 206, 207, secs. 165, 166; Tevis v. Tevis, 259 Mo. 19; Eckle v. Ryland, 256 Mo. 440; Grace v. Perry, 197 Mo. 550; O'Day v. O'Day, 193 Mo. 62; Drake v. Crane, 127 Mo. 85; Clotilde v. Lutz, 157 Mo. 439. And effect should be given to every word and clause. Tevis v. Tevis, 259 M......
-
Buder v. Stocke, 35182.
...the residuary estate with the payment of the legacies. Ganahl v. Ganahl, 19 S.W. (2d) 901; McQueen v. Lilly, 131 Mo. 18; O'Day v. O'Day, 193 Mo. 62, 4 L.R.A. (N.S.) 922; Rinehart v. Rinehart, 98 W. Va. 93, 126 S.E. 402, 42 A.L.R. 649; In re Estate of Strolberg, 106 Neb. 173, 183 N.W. 97, 26......
-
In re Bernheimer's Estate, 38602.
...753; Silsby v. Young, 3 Cranch, 249, 2 L. Ed. 429; Frost v. Wingate, 73 N.H. 535, 64 Atl. 19; Brant's Will, 40 Mo. 266; O'Day v. O'Day, 193 Mo. 62, 91 S.W. 921. (6) Circumstances establishing testatrix' intent that Part IV should either stand on an equality with Part V or should be preferre......