Deal v. Cooper

Decision Date06 February 1888
Citation6 S.W. 707,94 Mo. 62
PartiesDEAL v. COOPER.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

The description of a parcel of land called for 250 feet, more or less, to a stake; thence east, with the line dividing the N. W. ¼, etc., of section, etc. On applying the description to the land, it appeared that the call of 250 feet did not extend to the dividing line. Held, that the second call should read east, "parallel" with.

2. SAME — PAROL EVIDENCE — HARMLESS ERROR.

On the trial of an action in which the boundaries of a parcel of land came in question, parol evidence was admitted to show what the grantor intended to convey. Held, that it was no cause for reversal, as the judgment was clearly for the right party.

Appeal from circuit court, Dunklin county; JOHN G. WEAR, Judge.

This was an action of ejectment brought by Henry J. Deal against Andrew F. Cooper. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

S. G. Kitchen & Son and Smith, Silver & Brown, for appellant. George N. Boughton and J. J. Russel, for respondent.

BLACK, J.

In 1875 the plaintiff, Henry J. Deal, conveyed to James A. and the defendant, Andrew F. Cooper, a parcel of land by the following description: "Commencing at a stake 50 feet south of the center of the line of the Cairo, Arkansas & Texas Railroad, where said railroad crosses the section line between sections 22 and 23, on the west line of the N. W. ¼ of S. W. ¼ of said section 23; thence south 250 feet, more or less, with the section line to a stake; thence east with the line dividing the N. W. ¼ and the S. W. ¼ of the S. W. ¼ of said section 23, 600 feet, more or less, to the middle of N. W. ¼ of S. W. ¼ of said section 23, to a stake; thence north to the south line of the right of way of said Cairo, Arkansas & Texas Railroad; thence, in a southwesterly direction, along the right of way line aforesaid, to the place of beginning, — being in township 15 north, of range 10 east." This deed, on its face, describes about four acres of land. The plaintiff then owned six acres to the south of these four acres, which were occupied by tenants. Subsequently the defendant got possession of the ten acres, and set up title thereto, under the above deed, and the plaintiff brought this action of ejectment for the six acres.

The first call in the deed, it will be seen, is from the railroad south 250 feet, more or less, to a stake; and the second call is, thence east, with the line dividing the N. W. ¼ and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Central Missouri Oil Co. v. City of St. James
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 7 Diciembre 1937
    ... ... extension proceedings as applies in descriptions in deeds ... Our Supreme Court, in the case of Deal v. Cooper, 94 ... Mo. 62, 6 S.W. 707, said: "When the deed, applied to the ... subject-matter, shows a manifest omission in the description, ... ...
  • Central Missouri Oil Co. v. City of St. James
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 7 Diciembre 1937
    ...reference to descriptions in extension proceedings as applies in descriptions in deeds. Our Supreme Court, in the case of Deal v. Cooper, 94 Mo. 62, 6 S.W. 707, said: "When the deed, applied to the subject-matter, shows a manifest omission in the description, and there is sufficient data fu......
  • State ex inf. Gentry v. Hughesville Special Road Dist. No. 11 of Pettis County
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 18 Mayo 1928
    ...omission may be supplied by judicial construction, if there is sufficient data furnished by the instrument to supply the omission. Deal v. Cooper, 94 Mo. 62; Hoffman Riehl, 27 Mo. 554; Thomson v. Thomson, 115 Mo. 57; Nichols v. Boswell, 103 Mo. 151; Presnell v. Headley, 141 Mo. 187. If the ......
  • Presnell v. Headley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 3 Noviembre 1897
    ... ... relation to the other parts, and no inflexible rule of ... interpretation will be allowed to defeat its clear ... meaning." And in Deal v. Cooper, 94 Mo. 62, 6 ... S.W. 707, that "when the deed applied to the ... subject-matter shows a manifest omission in the description ... and ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT