Dean v. Crews
Decision Date | 29 March 1919 |
Citation | 81 So. 479,77 Fla. 319 |
Parties | DEAN et al. v. CREWS et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; W. S. Bullock, Judge.
Suit for partition by A. B. Crews and another against Annie Hollandsworth Dean and others. A demurrer to the bill of complaint was overruled, and defendants appeal. Reversed.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff
Syllabus by the Court
In the construction of a will, the intention of the testator, as therein expressed, shall prevail over all other considerations, if consistent with the principles of law. To this great rule in the exposition of wills, all others must bend.
An 'executory devise' is such a limitation of a future interest in lands or personal chattels as the law admits in the case of a will, though contrary to therules of limitation in conveyances at common law.
A bequest in the words 'upon the youngest of my four children arriving at the age of twenty-one years I give and bequeath, share and share alike, to my said four children all my real and personal property of whatever kind or nature not heretofore disposed of.' Held, to take effect when and at the time the youngest of the four children arrives at the age of 21 years.
COUNSEL H. M. Hampton, of Ocala, and H. N. Randolph, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.
John U Bird, of Clearwater, and Davis Moon, of Dunnellon, for appellees.
In a suit for the partition of land a demurrer to the bill of complaint was overruled, and the defendants appealed. It appears that Charles H. Hollandsworth died testate on January 20, 1907, leaving a widow, three daughters, Annie, Estel, and Alice, and one son, C. W Hollandsworth; that subsequent to the death of the testator his daughter Annie married J. W. Dean; that Alice married E A. Turnipseed; that on June 21, 1909, C. W. Hollandsworth died intestate and unmarried, leaving as his heirs his three sisters and his mother; that Estel married A. B. Crews, and that Estel died intestate on August 22, 1910, without issue leaving her husband her sole heir at law; that the youngest daughter, Alice, arrived at the age of 21 years on July 14, 1916. Other allegations need not be stated.
The question to be determined is the rights of the respective parties under the last clause of bequest in the will of Charles H. Hollandsworth, the will being as follows:
In the construction of a will, the intention of the testator, as therein expressed, shall prevail over all other considerations, if consistent with the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. Green
...or lineal descendant. In re Rentz' Estate, 152 So.2d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 156 So.2d 859 (Fla.1963); Dean v. Crews, 77 Fla. 319, 81 So. 479 (1919); 80 Am.Jur.2d Wills §§ 1409, 1415 (1975). The distribution should be per stirpes. Green v. Lewis, 113 Fla. 609, 151 So. 270 (193......
-
Hignett v. Sherman
... ... 878; Baker ... et al. v. Hibbs, 167 Iowa 174, 149 N.W. 85; Fulton v. Fulton, ... 179 Iowa 948, 162 N.W. 253, L.R.A. 1915E, 1080; Dean et al ... v. Crews, 77 Fla. 319, 81 So. 479; Bond v. Moore, 236 Ill ... 576, 86 N.E. 386, 19 L.R.A. (N. S.) 540 ... As we ... have ... ...
-
Blocker v. Blocker
... ... Commissioners' ... Decision ... Suit by ... Nina M. Blocker, a widow, against Hattie Dean Blocker, a ... widow, and others. From an adverse decree, defendants appeal ... Affirmed ... Syllabus ... by the Court ... Brown v. Harris, 90 Fla. 540, 106 So. 412; Cole ... v. Cole, 88 Fla. 347, 103 So. 78; Rewis v ... Rewis, 79 Fla. 126, 84 So. 93; Dean v. Crews, ... 77 Fla. 319, 81 So. 479; Floyd v. Smith, 59 Fla ... 485, 51 So. 537, 37 L. R. A. (N. S.) 651, 138 Am. St. Rep ... 133, 21 Ann. Cas. 318 ... ...
-
Sorrels v. Mcnally
... ... This rule prevails whether the ... entire will or some specific clause or part of it [89 Fla ... 463] is being construed. Dean v. Crews, 77 Fla. 319, ... 81 So. 479; 28 R. C. L. 211, and cases cited ... It is ... contended by appellee that, under the terms of ... ...
-
FEDERAL TRANSFER TAXES AND THE PROTEAN IRREVOCABLE TRUST.
...480 (Del. 1945); Pyne v. Pyne, 154 F.2d 297, 300 (D.C. Cir. 1946); Marshall v. Hewett, 24 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 1945) (citing Dean v. Crews, 81 So. 479, 479 (Fla. 1919)); Reynolds v. Harrison, 604 S.E.2d 184, 186 (Ga. 2004) (citing Kirby v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank 219 S.E.2d 112,113 (1975)......