Dean v. Dean

Decision Date17 February 1993
Citation618 So.2d 208
PartiesDean (Roger) v. Dean (Ruth) NO. 81,030
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal From: 4th DCA, 607 So.2d 494

Disposition: Rev. dism.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • American Tobacco Co. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 23, 1997
    ... ...         Haines, 975 F.2d at 90; see also Anderson v. State, 297 So.2d 871, 871-72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494 (Fla. 4th ... DCA 1992), rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993) ...         The social policy protecting the ... ...
  • Lane v. Sarfati
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 1996
    ... ... necessary to the existence of the [attorney-client] privilege that the lawyer render some additional service connected with the legal advice." Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494, 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993). Moreover, in considering whether the attorney-client ... ...
  • Metcalf v. Metcalf, 5D01-262.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 2001
    ... ... Moreover, the 785 So.2d 750 existence of the attorney/client privilege does not depend upon whether the client actually hires the attorney. Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993). It is enough if the client consults the attorney with ... ...
  • State v. Sanchez, 94-231
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1994
    ... ... Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665, 667 (Fla.1992); Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494, 499 n. 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993). Because now the supreme court has affirmed the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • 1-3 First Predicate: Attorney's Employment
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Legal Malpractice Law Title Chapter 1 Basics
    • Invalid date
    ...494, 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (also explaining that payment of fee is not required to create attorney-client privilege), review dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla. 1993). If a fee were required to establish an attorney-client relationship, a lawyer could never perform work pro bono for a client.4......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT