Dean v. Dean
Decision Date | 17 February 1993 |
Citation | 618 So.2d 208 |
Parties | Dean (Roger) v. Dean (Ruth) NO. 81,030 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial8 cases
-
American Tobacco Co. v. State
... ... Haines, 975 F.2d at 90; see also Anderson v. State, 297 So.2d 871, 871-72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494 (Fla. 4th ... DCA 1992), rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993) ... The social policy protecting the ... ...
-
Lane v. Sarfati
... ... necessary to the existence of the [attorney-client] privilege that the lawyer render some additional service connected with the legal advice." Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494, 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993). Moreover, in considering whether the attorney-client ... ...
-
Metcalf v. Metcalf, 5D01-262.
... ... Moreover, the 785 So.2d 750 existence of the attorney/client privilege does not depend upon whether the client actually hires the attorney. Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993). It is enough if the client consults the attorney with ... ...
-
State v. Sanchez, 94-231
... ... Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665, 667 (Fla.1992); Dean v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494, 499 n. 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev. dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla.1993). Because now the supreme court has affirmed the ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
1-3 First Predicate: Attorney's Employment
...494, 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (also explaining that payment of fee is not required to create attorney-client privilege), review dismissed, 618 So.2d 208 (Fla. 1993). If a fee were required to establish an attorney-client relationship, a lawyer could never perform work pro bono for a client.4......