Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Griffeth
Citation | 58 P.2d 323,1936 OK 420,177 Okla. 208 |
Decision Date | 02 June 1936 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 24394 |
Parties | DEEP ROCK OIL CORPORATION v. GRIFFETH |
Court | Supreme Court of Oklahoma |
¶0 1. WATERS AND WATER COURSES - Pollution of Stock Water - Measure of Damages for Death of Cattle.
The measure of damages for the loss of cattle that die as a result of drinking water from a polluted stream is the reasonable market value of said cattle at the time of injury.
2. SAME - Measure of Damages for Injury to Cattle.
Where cattle are damaged and depreciated in value as a result of drinking water from a polluted stream, the measure of damages is the difference between the reasonable market value of said cattle immediately prior to, and subsequent to the injury.
3. DAMAGES - Measure of Damages for Injury.
When the law gives a remedy for a wrong done, the compensation should be equal to the injury sustained, and the latter is the standard by which the former is to be measured. The injured party is to be placed as near as may be in the situation which he would have occupied had not the wrong been done.
Appeal from District Court, Payne County; Freeman E. Miller, Judge.
Action by F.L. Griffeth against the Deep Rock Oil Corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
W.F. Semple and Wilcox & Swank, for plaintiff in error.
Thomas A. Higgins, for defendant in error.
¶1 This action was instituted in the district court of Payne county by F.L. Griffeth, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the Deep Rock Oil Corporation, hereinafter referred to as defendant, wherein plaintiff sought to recover damages on account of the pollution of certain streams traversing his land. The cause was tried to a jury and a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff; from a judgment thereon defendant appeals.
¶2 Plaintiff alleged that he was engaged in the business of farming, stock raising, and dairying, and was the owner or lessee of certain pasture lands; that the defendant was engaged in the operation of oil wells upon lands in the vicinity of plaintiff's land; that on certian dates defendant permitted salt water, oil, and other refuse and deleterious substances to escape from its operations and flow into Wild Horse creek, which emptied into Euchee creek, and that both of said creeks traversed the lands of plaintiff and constituted his water supply for his cattle; that said cattle drank the poisoned and polluted water and by reason thereof five cows lost their calves and became sick and deteriorated in value; two heifers died, and certain other cattle were injured and damaged; that it became necessary to move the cattle to other pastures and to procure other water; that all of said damage was caused by the acts of defendant in permitting the escape of the pollutive substances into Wild Horse creek.
¶3 The various items of damage claimed amounted to the sum of $2,953. The verdict of the jury was for the sum of $1,239.
¶4 It is contended first that the trial court was without jurisdiction for the reason that the petition stated a cause of action for injuries principally to real property and that the real estate was located in Lincoln county and not in Payne county. There is no merit in this contention. The allegations of the petition and the proof offered in support thereof show that no claim whatever is made for damages to any portion of the real property involved.
¶5 Defendant contends that the trial court erred in the admission of certain evidence relating to the measure of damages. Plaintiff testified that as a result of drinking the salt water five cows lost their calves, and in regard to the value of the calves and the damage thereby sustained to the cows, plaintiff was permitted to testify as follows:
¶6 Regarding the value of two heifers that died as a result of drinking salt water, plaintiff testified as follows:
¶7 Plaintiff claims further damages to his entire herd of cattle on account of their drinking salt water and their removal to another pasture. In connection with this element of damage, plaintiff testified as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beason v. I. E. Miller Servs., Inc.
...will compensate for all detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not."14 Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Griffeth , 1936 OK 420, 58 P.2d 323, 325, citing Van Sickle v. Franklin , 1917 OK 100, 162 P. 950, and Sackett v. Rose , 1916 OK 2, 154 P. 1177.15 Deep Rock......
-
Storley v. Armour & Co.
...if the nuisance complained of had not existed. This case in this respect is more nearly analogous to that of Deep Rock Oil Corporation v. Griffeth, 177 Okl. 208, 58 P.2d 323. There the plaintiff sought to recover damages caused by the pollution of the water which his cattle drank. His testi......
-
Darby Petroleum Corp. v. Rogers
...the difference between the market value of the cattle immediately before and immediately after the injury, citing Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. Griffeth, 177 Okla. 208, 58 P.2d 323. ¶14 It cannot be said that this instruction, as far as it went, was erroneous; the most that can be said is that the......
-
Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Joyner
...a tort is such an amount that will compensate for all detriment proximately caused thereby. 23 O.S.1951 § 61. Deep Rock Oil Corporation v. Griffeth, 177 Okl. 208, 58 P.2d 323; Denco Bus Lines, Inc., v. Hargis, 204 Okl. 339, 229 P.2d The judgment not being otherwise challenged, we affirm. HA......