Delgado v. Pasternak

Decision Date09 November 1964
Citation254 N.Y.S.2d 131,22 A.D.2d 799
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesJulia DELGADO, Appellant, and Felix Delgado, Plaintiff, v. Stefan PASTERNAK, Respondent.

Delukey & Shapiro, Brooklyn, for appellant; Stanley Shapiro, Brooklyn, of counsel.

Bernard Helfenstein, Brooklyn, for respondent; Michael B. Grossman, Brooklyn, of counsel.

Before BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, CHRIST, HILL and RABIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained by the plaintiffJulia Delgado, said plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 21, 1962 after trial, upon a jury's verdict in favor of the defendant.The action by the plaintiff's husband, Felix Delgado, was discontinued, with prejudice, during trial.

Judgment reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event.No questions of fact have been considered.

It is plaintiff's claim that about nine-thirty or ten o'clock on the night of September 12, 1958, she was caused to trip and fall on a stairway in a rooming house owned and maintained by the defendant.

At the trial defendant sought to establish that plaintiff's injuries, which included a broken arm, did not result from a fall on the stairs but were sustained when she was assaulted by her husband, from whom she later separated.Defendant produced a witness who said that between 5:00 and 6:00 p. m. he heard considerable noise and screaming coming from the furnished room occupied by plaintiff and her husband.The witness did...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • People v. Higgins
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1977
    ...N.Y.S. 694, affd. 172 N.Y. 656, 65 N.E. 1122; Saporito v. New York, 14 N.Y.2d 474, 253 N.Y.S.2d 985, 202 N.E.2d 369; Delgado v. Pasternak, 22 A.D.2d 799, 254 N.Y.S.2d 131; People v. Byrnes, 33 N.Y.2d 343, 352 N.Y.S.2d 913, 308 N.E.2d 435; see, also, 21 N.Y.Juris., Evid. § 355 et seq.) Motio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT