Delifus v. State

Decision Date21 May 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-1625,86-1625
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 1308,507 So.2d 753
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 1308 Leon Pervil DELIFUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.

We affirm the judgment of guilt and the order withholding imposition of sentence and placing defendant on probation. However, we reverse the condition of probation which imposed costs.

The state must provide adequate notice of assessment of costs to a defendant with full opportunity to object to the costs and any enforcement may occur only after a judicial finding that an indigent defendant has the ability to pay. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Williams v. State, 492 So.2d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Fletcher v. State, 491 So.2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Since the record does not show that the defendant was given notice and opportunity to object, the imposition of the costs was improper. Accordingly, the costs should be stricken without prejudice to the state to tax them in accordance with the procedure outlined in Jenkins.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Thomas v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 septembre 1987
    ...100 (Fla.1983).7 See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Harris v. State, 507 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Delifus v. State, 507 So.2d 753 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Hardy v. State, 503 So.2d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Chance v. State, 498 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Butler v. State,......
  • Outar v. State, 86-1713
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 juin 1987
    ...opinion is not affected by the recent supreme court decision in State v. Yost, 12 F.L.W. 221 (Fla. May 7, 1987).2 See Delifus v. State, 507 So.2d 753 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Harris v. State, 507 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Hardy v. State, 503 So.2d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Chance v. State,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT