Delio v. City of New York, 2003-06522.
Decision Date | 07 June 2004 |
Docket Number | 2003-06522. |
Citation | 8 A.D.3d 325,2004 NY Slip Op 04661,777 N.Y.S.2d 911 |
Parties | MARK DELIO, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cause of action to recover damages for common-law negligence is reinstated, that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on that cause of action is granted and that branch of the cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action is denied.
The plaintiff, a New York City police officer, commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he allegedly sustained when a fellow officer closed the door of their patrol car on his hand during the course of a traffic stop of a vehicle. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for common-law negligence, concluding that it was barred by the firefighter's rule (see Santangelo v State of New York, 71 NY2d 393 [1988]).
A police officer may not recover damages for common-law negligence where "some act taken in furtherance of a specific police . . . function exposed the officer to a heightened risk of sustaining the particular injury" (Zanghi v Niagara Frontier Transp. Commn., 85 NY2d 423, 439 [1995]). The firefighter's rule bars "only those claims for injuries caused by the negligence of a fellow police officer when the injury is related to the dangers that are associated with police functions" (Cooper v City of New York, 81 NY2d 584, 591 [1993]). Where the injuries sustained during the performance of an officer's duties as a result of a fellow officer's negligence "are wholly unrelated to the assumed risks of police duty," common-law recovery is not barred (id. at 592).
The plaintiff's injuries were unrelated to the assumed risks of police duty. His...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wadler v. City of N.Y.
...plaintiff at increased risk for this accident to happen. Likewise, the firefighter rule did not apply in Delio v. City of New York, 8 A.D.3d 325, 777 N.Y.S.2d 911 [2d Dept.2004]. In that case, plaintiff police officer was injured when a fellow officer closed a car door on plaintiff's hand. ......
-
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v. American Management Association International, Inc.
... ... Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York", First Department ... June 10, 2004 ... [8 A.D.3d 68] ... \xC2" ... ...