Della Croce v. City of New York

Decision Date29 August 2002
Citation297 A.D.2d 257,746 N.Y.S.2d 484
PartiesMARVIN DELLA CROCE et al., Appellants-Respondents,<BR>v.<BR>CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Plaintiff, a Transit Authority employee, alleges that he fell off a ladder while attaching a three-by-five-foot bulletin board to the wall of a subway station locker room owned by defendant City. The motion court correctly held that such work did not involve "making a significant physical change to the configuration or composition of the building or structure," and therefore did not constitute "altering" within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) (Joblon v Solow, 91 NY2d 457, 465; compare, Futterman v Rela Realty Corp., 283 AD2d 261, with Catoliato v Sam's Club, 254 AD2d 62, lv dismissed 93 NY2d 888).

Plaintiff's claims based on Labor Law § 241 (6) should also have been dismissed since plaintiff was not performing any of the tasks enumerated in part 23 of the Industrial Code (12 NYCRR 23-1.4 [b] [13]) when he was injured (see, Joblon, supra at 466).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Clark
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 Julio 2013
    ...Aller, 33 A.D.3d 621, 622, 821 N.Y.S.2d 657 [2006],lv. dismissed8 N.Y.3d 918, 834 N.Y.S.2d 509, 866 N.E.2d 455 [2007];People v. Jones, 297 A.D.2d at 257, 746 N.Y.S.2d 596)—particularly given that the jury was not asked whether (nor did it otherwise indicate that) it was satisfied with Count......
  • Bodtman v. Living Manor Love, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Abril 2013
    ...866, 834 N.E.2d 776 [2005];Joblon v. Solow, 91 N.Y.2d 457, 465, 672 N.Y.S.2d 286, 695 N.E.2d 237 [1998];Della Croce v. City of New York, 297 A.D.2d 257, 746 N.Y.S.2d 484 [1st Dept. 2002] ). Although RM Farm raised this argument for the first time in its reply affirmation in support of its m......
  • Spencer v. 322 Partners, L.L.C., Index no. 160133/2014
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Febrero 2018
    ...the removal of two bolts and the replacement of a part of a crane did not involve a significant physical change]; Croce v. City of New York, 297 A.D.2d 257 [1st Dept 2002] [plaintiff's work of attaching a three by five bulletin board to a wall was not an alteration]; compare Panek v. County......
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 29 Agosto 2002
    ...297 A.D.2d 256746 N.Y.S.2d 596THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,v.MICHAEL JONES, Appellant.Decided August 29, 2002.Concur ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT