DeLong Equipment Co. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co.

Citation896 F.2d 560
PartiesDelong Equipment Company v. Washington Mills Abrasive Company NO. 88-8664
Decision Date22 January 1990
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)

N.D.Ga., 887 F.2d 1499

DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Marshall v. City of Atlanta
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • March 29, 1996
    ...DeLong Equipment Co. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co., 887 F.2d 1499, 1518 (11th Cir. 1989) (quotation omitted), reh'g denied, en banc, 896 F.2d 560, cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1081, 110 S.Ct. 1813, 108 L.Ed.2d 943 Plaintiff broadly alleges in paragraph 80 that defendants wrongfully interfered ......
  • DeLong Equipment Co. v. Washington Mills Electro Minerals Corp., 92-8049
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 17, 1993
    ...808 (1988). DeLong Equip. Co. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co., 887 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1989), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied, 896 F.2d 560, cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1081, 110 S.Ct. 1813, 108 L.Ed.2d 943 (1990) (DeLong II ). 1 In Delong II, this court indicated that the essence of the......
  • In re Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 15, 1994
    ...and (v) damage to the plaintiff. DeLong Equipment Co. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co., 887 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1989), reh'g denied, 896 F.2d 560, cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1081, 110 S.Ct. 1813, 108 L.Ed.2d 943 (1990); Butler v. Terminix Intern, Inc., 175 Ga.App. 816, 334 S.E.2d 865 (Ga.App.19......
  • Prescott v. Independent Life and Acc. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • February 8, 1995
    ...202 (1986). See also DeLong Equip. Co. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co., 887 F.2d 1499, 1505 (11th Cir.1989), rehearing denied, 896 F.2d 560 (11th Cir.1990). All the evidence and the inferences from the underlying facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant. Earley v.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT