DeMarquez v. Gallo

Decision Date23 May 2006
Docket Number2004-10553.
PartiesBRUNA DeMARQUEZ, Appellant, v. ANGELO GALLO et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the dismissal is vacated, and the action is restored to the trial calendar.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the trial calendar after it had been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. The plaintiff demonstrated a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the failure to timely restore, a lack of intent to abandon the matter, and a lack of prejudice to the opposing party (see Kranz v Braverman, 15 AD3d 451 [2005]). Thus, her motion should have been granted.

Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Demarquez v. Gallo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 24, 2012
    ...order dated August 18, 2004, vacated the dismissal of the action, and restored the action to the trial calendar ( see DeMarquez v. Gallo, 29 A.D.3d 853, 814 N.Y.S.2d 528). [94 A.D.3d 1040] Subsequent to this Court's decision and order dated May 23, 2006, restoring the action to the trial ca......
  • DiLorenzo v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 23, 2006
  • D'Agnese v. Spinelli, 2004-10900.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 23, 2006

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT