Dempster v. Fite

Decision Date14 December 1932
Docket Number475.
Citation167 S.E. 33,203 N.C. 697
PartiesDEMPSTER v. FITE.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Mecklenburg County; MacRae, Special Judge.

Action by Caroline Dempster against John Fite. From the judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

No error.

In action for injuries occurring at night when defendant motorist struck rear of automobile in which plaintiff was riding, negligence held for jury.

This was an action for actionable negligence, brought by plaintiff against defendant alleging damage. Plaintiff was a telephone operator in the employ of the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, and worked until 9 o'clock the night of her injury-- July 25, 1931. After working hours, she and a lady friend went to Gastonia, N. C., with two young men, over the Wilkinson boulevard. On the return trip she was riding in the rear seat of the automobile. Plaintiff testified, in part: "Our car was struck in the rear and was torn completely up. It knocked it a long distance down the highway. The car that hit us, when I got out, was jammed into the back of our car. They were locked together. We were struck right in the middle of the back seat. I was knocked against the front seat almost unconscious. Inez McLendon helped me out of the car. *** I went to bed. I went to the hospital a week afterwards. Dr. Alonzo Myers put me there. I stayed in the hospital two weeks. He put me in a plaster cast the first day I went to see him. I have the cast on now. I have been wearing the cast for nine months. After I left the hospital I went to my apartment on East Fifth Street and stayed there about two months or a little over. I was unable to be up and have not worked since. I tried to do a little house work, but when I do I get completely worn out. I have to go to bed and rest. I was in bed two months at home and two weeks in the hospital and after that I stayed in bed the best part of the day. *** My back pains me a lot. I was not hurt in any other part of the body but I am nervous. I was terribly bruised on the night of the accident. My arms were black and blue all over. The seat I was in was pushed up to the front and the front seat broken out. I am twenty-two years old. *** The accident happened a little after twelve. *** We did not stop any place--from the time we left home until the accident happened except to change drivers. We were running about twenty-five or thirty miles an hour when we were struck. It must have knocked us about fifty yards. His car was hooked up with ours. I spoke to Mr. Fite when I got out and then I collapsed after he said he was going to do all the damage he could. He deliberately backed his car back and came forward and hit our car again. I fainted but in a few minutes I came to. They pushed Mr. Fite's car back from our car to clear the road. Mr. Fite said 'I am going to complete this thing.' *** I live with my parents in Spartanburg, the first I told them of this accident was when I was taken to the hospital. My mother came but my father is an invalid."

On cross-examination the plaintiff testified that she had filed a complaint for injury by collision, which occurred July 4 1930, whereby her pelvic bones had been broken in three places, that she had been placed in and remained in a plaster cast for a period of four months. Plaintiff, after defendant's evidence was introduced, was recalled and testified: "I remember the date of my first injury when the pelvic bones were cracked--July 4th, 1930. I went to work after that injury about November 15th. I worked steadily after that until the night of this accident."

The car plaintiff was riding in, when hit from the rear, was on the right-hand side, in compliance with the law of the road with no obstruction to prevent any one in the rear from seeing the car plaintiff was riding in. It was a straight road, and was a clear night. It was a hard lick, the car plaintiff was in was knocked 50 to 60 feet. Defendant denied negligence, and contended that the rear light of the car in which plaintiff was riding was not burning.

Dennis Deal, witness for plaintiff, testified in part: "The center of his (Fite's) radiator hit the spare tire on my car, it was a steel wheel on the back of my car. His car was jammed in the back of my car. *** Mr. Fite got in his car to drive it out of the road and ran into the back end of us again. Our car was torn up as much as possibly could be done to it. The rear seat was broken in two. The rear seat was knocked part of the way towards the front of the car. The front seats were broken off too. Mr. Fite's car hit my spare wheel and tore it up. *** Mr. Fite told me everything would be all right --that he would fix everything up and not let the Sheriff lock him up."

L. N Warren, witness for plaintiff, testified in part, speaking of defendant: "I could not say who passed me before I got to where the wreck was but he was driving a yellow Ford Cabriolet. The next time I saw it, it was in back of Mr Deal's car. I will say it must have been doing sixty or sixty-five miles an hour. *** The road was straight there. I found Mr. Fite's car in the rear end of Mr. Deal's car, it was fastened to the car. They were both in bad condition. The seats of Deal's car on the inside looked like dynamite had turned loose inside. The front seat was broken off. *** Miss Dempster said she would rather come on to Charlotte and have her own doctor. While we were coming home, every time we would hit a little bump, she would holler with her back until she came to herself. She was unconscious until we got to Belmont. We went to the doctor's house and talked with him and she decided to come on home. We came from Belmont to Charlotte. We took her to her apartment on Fifth Street."

A. D Nixon, witness for plaintiff, testified in part: "Before this we walked across the road. Mr. Deal called the Deputy Sheriff off and they were talking and I heard Mr. Fite say 'Don't have me arrested, Dennis. I understand it was my fault, but I will fix everything up."'

Sam T. Reid, witness for plaintiff, testified in part: "My home is in Gastonia--I am engaged in the automobile repair business. *** I repaired the two automobiles but did not tow them in. *** The body of the Deal car was damaged a great deal and the front of the Fite car was damaged a great deal. The rear panel of the Deal car caved in. Spare tire was shoved through the rear panel for a good ways. Far enough to break the back of the back seat in two, the woodwork was broken in half. The front seats were broken off, the rear part of the frame was bent. The radiator, hood, and front axle and frame of the Fite car was damaged. The radiator, the frame, the hood and the front axle of the Fite car were damaged, the radiator was pushed back into the fan. Mr. Fite's car was a yellow Ford Coupé. ***"

Inez McLendon, witness for plaintiff, testified in part: "We left the apartment about fifteen of ten, or probably ten. Miss Dempster, Mr. Deal, Mr. Lineberger and myself. We got in the automobile--I rode in the back seat with Mr. Lineberger. We started to Gastonia and turned at Fair Ground and changed, I got in the front seat with Mr. Lineberger and Miss Dempster and Mr. Deal got in the back seat. We started back to Charlotte--we had not stopped on the road. Just on this side of the Hatch Hosiery Mill we were coming back to Charlotte, and all of a sudden we heard a terrific crash, we didn't know what had happened, I thought a train had hit us. We were shocked for a moment, I couldn't realize what had happened. The first thing I realized some one was flashing a light in the car. Three men were standing outside, later I found it was the Sheriff, Mr. Warren and Mr. Nixon. I got out first on the outside of the road and helped Miss Dempster out. I was holding both arms around her to hold her up, she could not stand up by herself. She was complaining 'Oh my back' and I couldn't do anything for her. *** After talking with him (defendant) she crumpled down on the highway. That was back of our car, I couldn't help lift her, I called to some of the men to help me."

The defendant testified, in part: "I was coming from Lowell on the Wilkinson Boulevard, I was on the right-hand side of the road making a speed around forty-five miles an hour. When this car all of a sudden loomed up ahead of me without a tail light. I attempted to miss it and stop, but I failed. I hit the car, but I did all in my power to prevent it. *** I broke three of my front teeth off and broke my nose. I had two black eyes and several gashes about the neck, body and a sprained ankle." The defendant denied the material allegations of plaintiff and her witnesses a. B. Roberson, for defendant, testified in part: "I saw the Deal car pass. The big glass door in front of the mill as I walked up there and looked out they were coming on right slow, the front light was out and it attracted my attention. Then I went out, I kept watching them on until they went out of light of the mill which shined on the road. There was no light in the rear of their car. I saw the yellow car pass. I didn't pay much attention to it, it seemed that neither one were breaking any speed. He didn't attract my attention very much. His lights were burning. Immediately after that, I heard the noise and broke and ran up there. *** The mill is about fifty feet from the road. I was on the inside of the mill looking out of the big glass door when the Deal car passed. I was attracted to the car because it was running so slow and because it didn't have any lights. The right-hand light was burning on the outside, the left-hand light next to me was out. I also watched the tail light. It attracted my attention and I noticed it, I was coming out of the door at that time. I had done made my round...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Patrick v. Treadwell
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1942
    ... ... the consideration of the jury, and that its admission was ... prejudicial to the defendants ...          The ... case of Dempster v. Fite, 203 N.C. 697, 167 S.E. 33, ... 37, is cited by plaintiff as an authority in support of the ... competency of the evidence offered, but it ... ...
  • Keith v. Gregg
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1936
    ... ... 186 N.C. 475, 119 S.E. 884." State v ... Hightower, 187 N.C. 300, 307, 121 S.E. 616; State v ... Fox, 197 N.C. 478, 486, 149 S.E. 735; Dempster v ... Fite, 203 N.C. 697, 706, 707, 167 S.E. 33; Green v ... Casualty Co., 203 N.C. 767, 772, 167 S.E. 38; State ... v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co., ... ...
  • State v. David
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 11, 1942
    ... ... the jury should find the purported facts in the Forbus ... statement to be true. Dempster v. Fite, 203 N.C ... 697, 167 S.E. 33; Summerlin v. Cardina & N. W. Railroad ... Co., 133 N.C. 550, 551, 45 S.E. 898; Martin v. P. H ... Hanes ... ...
  • State v. McGhee, 725SC614
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1972
    ...any reference to whether the jury 'should find from the evidence' or '(find) the facts to be from the evidence.' Dempster v. Fite, 203 N.C. 697, 167 S.E. 33 (1932); Stansbury, N.C. Evidence 2d, § 137. However, we are of the opinion that the error, if any, committed by allowing the question ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT