Denslow v. Dodendorf

Decision Date03 March 1896
Docket Number6108
Citation66 N.W. 409,47 Neb. 328
PartiesJERRY DENSLOW v. IDA DODENDORF
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

ERROR from the district court of Dodge county. Tried below before MARSHALL, J.

AFFIRMED.

A. H Briggs, for plaintiff in error.

T. M Franse, contra.

OPINION

NORVAL, J.

Ida Dodendorf brought suit before Hal Christy, a justice of the peace of Cuming township, in Dodge county, against Jerry Denslow to recover the sum of $ 82.41 for work and labor. The parties appeared, and trial was had before the justice on July 20, 1892, who on said date spread upon his docket the following entry: "Upon the hearing of the evidence I find that there is due the plaintiff from the defendant the sum of $ 82.41, and costs of this action, taxed at $ 6.05. Dated this 20th day of July, 1892. Hal Christy, Justice of the Peace." On July 27 the defendant filed with the justice an appeal bond, which was duly approved. A transcript of the proceedings, including the appeal undertaking, was filed by the defendant in the district court on the 20th day of August, 1892. Subsequently the plaintiff and appellee filed in the district court a motion to dismiss the appeal because the transcript was filed after the expiration of the time required by law, which motion was sustained and the appeal dismissed. To obtain a reversal of this decision is the purpose of this proceeding.

It is conceded by plaintiff in error that the transcript was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court one day beyond the period allowed by statute within which to perfect an appeal, but he insists that the delay was not occasioned through his fault or laches; hence the appeal should not have been dismissed. It is disclosed that the transcript was obtained by the plaintiff in error from the justice on August 18, and upon the same day it was inclosed in an envelope addressed to the clerk of the district court of Dodge county, with postage prepaid thereon, and deposited in the post-office at Scribner, Nebraska, which was in ample time for it to have reached its destination by the usual course of mail, and to have been received and filed by said clerk within the statutory period. It is insisted by plaintiff in error that he had a right to rely upon the United States mail for the transmission of his transcript and having mailed it in time, he exercised that degree of diligence which the law required of him in perfecting his appeal, and Cheney v. Buckmaster, 29 Neb. 420, 45 N.W. 640, is cited to sustain the proposition. That case lacks analogy. There the request for the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT