Dep't of Revenue v. Williams
Decision Date | 17 February 2012 |
Docket Number | No. 1D11–3538.,1D11–3538. |
Citation | 79 So.3d 240 |
Parties | DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Lemeicia L. RAMBERT, Appellant, v. Donald G. WILLIAMS, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
An appeal from an order of the Department of Revenue.Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
The Department of Revenue (“DOR”) seeks review of an administrative support order that deviated from the standard child support guidelines. DOR argues that the administrative law judge erred in reducing Donald Williams' child support obligations by deviating from the child support guidelines based upon a verbal visitation agreement that was not court-authorized. We agree with DOR and find that this case is materially indistinguishable from this Court's recent opinions in Department of Revenue ex rel. Sherman v. Daly, 74 So.3d 165 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) and Department of Revenue ex rel. Bohm v. Koehler, 77 So.3d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ( ). In Daly, we held that “the Legislature has expressed its intent to authorize deviations from the child support guidelines only where there exists a written, court-authorized parenting-plan.” Daly, 74 So.3d at 168. Thus, for the reasons explained in Daly, we reverse the administrative support order, and remand this case to the Division of Administrative Hearings for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Carty v. State
-
Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Boeckler v. Cavanaugh, 1D11–6622.
...1st DCA 2011); Department of Revenue ex. rel. Bohm v. Koehler, 77 So.3d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); and Department of Revenue ex. rel. Rambert v. Williams, 79 So.3d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Deviation from the child support guidelines is authorized “only where there exists a written, court-auth......
-
Fla. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Johnson v. Zackery
...1st DCA 2011); Department of Revenue ex. rel. Bohm v. Koehler, 77 So.3d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); and Department of Revenue ex. rel. Rambert v. Williams, 79 So.3d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Deviation from the child support guidelines is authorized “only where there exists a written, court-auth......
-
Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Santillana v. Dorkins, 1D11–5288.
...compels the deviation.Id.; see also Dep't of Revenue v. Aluscar, 82 So.3d 1165, 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Dep't of Revenue v. Williams, 79 So.3d 240, 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Accordingly, we reverse the support order on appeal and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.......