Department of Admin., Office of State Employees' Ins. v. Ganson

Decision Date13 September 1990
Docket NumberNo. 75396,75396
Citation566 So.2d 791
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly S469 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF STATE EMPLOYEES' INSURANCE, Petitioner, v. Terri J. GANSON, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Augustus D. Aikens, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Admin., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Kenneth D. Kranz of Eric B. Tilton, P.A., Tallahassee, for respondent.

GRIMES, Justice.

Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, we accepted jurisdiction in Ganson v. Department of Administration, 554 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), to resolve conflict with Standard Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla.1990).

Ganson successfully litigated a claim for state health insurance benefits in which the district court of appeal ordered a hearing to determine an appropriate attorney's fee. Ganson v. Department of Admin., 554 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). * The hearing officer submitted a report, which the district court adopted in toto. In that report, the hearing officer recognized that there was a split of authority on the issue but concluded that a contingency-risk multiplier was required because there was a contingent-fee agreement between the client and her attorney.

A few weeks after the district court of appeal affirmed the fee award, we issued Quanstrom, which held that the multiplier is not automatically required in contingent-fee cases. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d at 831. Therefore, the opinion below is incorrect and must be quashed. We remand for reconsideration in light of Quanstrom.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH, BARKETT and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

* That decision is not under review here.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Procacci Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 95-3317
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • January 22, 1997
    ...parties can agree on the amount of fees and costs, evidence has to be taken on these questions. See Dep't of Admin., Office of State Employees' Ins. v. Ganson, 566 So.2d 791 (Fla.1990). Entitlement is limited to fees and costs reasonably incurred by appellees in defending the appeal. While ......
  • State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • December 23, 1993
    ...that attorney fees may also be recoverable for the time spent litigating entitlement to attorney fees."), quashed on other grounds, 566 So.2d 791 (Fla.1990); Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ("[A]ttorney's fees were properly awardable under the ... statute ......
  • Weaver v. School Bd. of Leon County, 91-2920
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • September 14, 1993
    ...... its brief acknowledges that this court, in Ganson v. State, Department of Administration, 554 So.2d ......
  • State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • July 31, 1991
    ...that attorney fees may also be recoverable for the time spent litigating entitlement to attorney fees"), rev'd on other grounds, 566 So.2d 791 (Fla.1990); Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ("attorneys' fees were properly awardable under the above statute for......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT