Department of Labor and Employment Sec., Div. of Workers' Compensation v. American Bldg. Maintenance

Decision Date02 May 1984
Docket NumberNo. AC-343,AC-343
Citation449 So.2d 932
PartiesDEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION and Gladys Suarez, Appellants, v. AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Douglas P. Chanco, Tallahassee, for appellant/Department of Labor and Employment Security.

Franklyn B. Glinn, Miami, for appellant/Gladys Suarez.

Eugene Williams of Williams & Zientz, Coral Gables, for appellees.

ON MOTION FOR REVIEW OF DENIAL OF MOTION TO TAX COSTS

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on a motion filed by the Department, pursuant to Rule 9.400(c), Fla.R.App.P., for review of the deputy commissioner's order denying the Department's motion to tax costs. We reverse, and order costs of the appeal incurred by the claimant in Suarez v. American Building Maintenance, 412 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), to be paid by the employer/carrier.

Gladys Suarez, a claimant in a workers' compensation proceeding, appealed an adverse order. Pursuant to Florida Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure, claimant filed a verified petition for relief from costs. The petition was granted in an order dated May 20, 1981, with the costs to be borne by the Workers' Compensation Administrative Trust Fund. The record costs totaled $2,563.95.

This court found that the appeal was concerned primarily with alleged material errors in the deputy's findings and reversed the order and remanded the cause for further proceedings. Suarez v. American Building Maintenance, supra. Following the issuance of this mandate, the Department of Labor and Employment Security moved for payment of costs to the Workers' Compensation Administrative Trust Fund by the employer/carrier.

On June 30, 1982, the deputy commissioner entered an order in which he made new findings of fact, found the claimant's condition to be unchanged, and again denied and dismissed claimant's petition for modification. A Motion to Tax Costs was heard on February 25, 1983. Costs were denied by the deputy commissioner on the grounds that all benefits claimed were ultimately denied and the claimant was not the prevailing party as contemplated by Section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes.

The Department timely filed a notice of appeal. This court dismissed the appeal with directions to file a motion for review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c).

Costs are to be taxed to the prevailing party unless the court orders otherwise under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a). If a claimant in a workers' compensation proceeding "should prevail in any proceeding before a deputy commissioner or court," costs are to be taxed against the employer. Section 440.34(3). In this case, the issue is solely one of taxation of appellate costs. In the appeal to this court, the claimant was the "prevailing party" in that her allegations as to the errors in the findings of fact were sustained and the order reversed. Tomorrow's Choice, Inc. v. Bassing Company, Inc., 364 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (counter-plaintiff who won a reversal was entitled to appellate costs even though on...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Commercial Carrier Corp. v. LaPointe, 97-2631.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 1999
    ...Such error must be the kind that could commonly be considered inconsequential. Department of Labor & Employment Security v. American Building Maintenance, 449 So.2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We cannot say that awarding future medical benefits where none were properly claimed and noticed is o......
  • Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hooks, AUTO-OWNERS
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 1985
    ...a "prevailing party" within the meaning of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a). Dept. of Labor & Employment Security v. Am. Bldg. Main., 449 So.2d 932, 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); see also Thaller v. Waterford Point Condominium Apartments, Inc., 437 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA The portion......
  • Stringer v. Katzell
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1997
    ...appeal, she was entitled to the award of appellate costs under rule 9.400(a). Department of Labor and Employment Sec. v. American Bldg. Maintenance, 449 So.2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Dev. Co., 432 So.2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Swan v. Wisdom, 392 So.2d 987 (Fla. ......
  • Village Inn Restaurant v. Aridi
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 31, 1989
    ...Such error must be the kind that could commonly be considered inconsequential. Department of Labor & Employment Security v. American Building Maintenance, 449 So.2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We cannot say that awarding future medical benefits where none were properly claimed and noticed is o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT