Department of Professional Regulation v. Bernal
| Decision Date | 06 October 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 71854,71854 |
| Citation | 531 So.2d 967,13 Fla. L. Weekly 603 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 603 DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Petitioner, v. Pedro F. BERNAL, M.D., Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Lisa S. Nelson, Appellate Atty., Mike Cohen, Trial Atty., and William O'Neil, Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Frank Diaz Silveira of Diaz Silveira & Associates, P.A., Coral Gables, for respondent.
We accepted Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), for review because the district court certified conflict with Britt v. Department of Professional Regulation, 492 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, and approve Bernal and disapprove Britt.
A hearing officer recommended a ninety-day suspension followed by a one-year probation after finding that Dr. Bernal had assisted the practice of medicine by unlicensed persons. 1 The Department of Professional Regulation filed exceptions to the penalty and recommended a one-year suspension. The Florida Board of Medicine, however, revoked Dr. Bernal's medical license outright. Its recited reasons for rejecting the recommended penalty were that Dr. Bernal was less than candid in his testimony before the hearing officer and that patients were endangered by unlicensed persons practicing medicine.
The district court, noting the provisions of subsection 120.57(1)(b)10, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986), found that the reasons utilized to modify the recommended order were insufficient and directed the board to implement the penalty recommended by the hearing officer. DPR argues that the district court cannot substitute its judgment for the medical board and must approve the board's recommendations. This is not what the district court did. It found that the board did not comply with the statute's requirement of stating valid reasons and citing to the record to justify its action. We hold that the district court can and should review the reasons asserted by an agency in modifying a hearing officer's recommended order. If the reasons for the change are legally insufficient, it is entirely appropriate to remand with instructions to approve the hearing officer's recommendations. 2
While we approve the district court of appeal's decision in this case, we are mindful that the medical board has great expertise and discretion. Reviewing courts cannot substitute their...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Payne v. Miami
...Britt v. Dep't of Prof'l Regulation, 492 So.2d 697, 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), disapproved on other grounds, Dep't of Prof'l Regulation v. Bernal, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla.1988) (confirming that the agency need not address issues raised and addressed before an ALJ). The Department also rejected Pet......
-
Kirby v. State
... ... 1. Pay the cost of necessary medical and related professional services and devices relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological ... To this end, we agree with the discussion in People v. Bernal, 101 Cal.App.4th 155, 123 Cal.Rptr.2d 622 (2002), regarding the ... ...
-
Escobar v. Department of Professional Regulation, Bd. of Medicine, 89-2531
...severity of the offense in question. See Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), aff'd, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla.1988); accord Hanley v. Department of Professional Regulation, 549 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regula......
-
I.M. v. State, 1D05-2001.
... ... proceedings, John Merrill, who was employed in the maintenance department of the Duval County public school system, testified that he was the ... ...
-
The 2003 amendments to the Florida APA.
...Regulation, 492 So. 2d 697, 699-700 (Fla. 1st D.C.A.), disapproved on other grounds, Department of Professional Regulation v. Bernal, 531 So. 2d 967 (Fla. (28) 2003 Fla. Laws ch. 94 [section] 7, amending FLA. STAT. [section] 120.60(1). Prior to 1996, the APA provided that the license was "d......