Department of Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.
Decision Date | 28 June 1937 |
Docket Number | 4-4640 |
Citation | 108 S.W.2d 586,194 Ark. 354 |
Parties | DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES v. ARKANSAS LOUISIANA GAS COMPANY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division; Richard M. Mann Judge; reversed.
Cause reversed.
Thomas Fitzhugh, for appellants.
H. C Walker, Jr., and Moore, Gray, Burrow & Chowning, for appellee.
P. A Lasley, amicus curiae.
General Order No. 13 was issued by appellant on April 13, 1935. It directed public utility companies doing business within the state, as defined in § 1 of act 324 of 1935, to file with the Department of Public Utilities all schedules of rates in effect as of April 2, 1935. In response to this order, appellee, a Delaware corporation doing business in Arkansas, filed a partial schedule. From this report there was omitted the schedule of rates charged for certain classes of service. Included in the class of service for which no schedule was filed were about forty customers who purchased large quantities of gas for industrial purposes, and five classified as customers buying at wholesale and engaged in retail distribution to individual customers.
On November 4, 1935, the Department issued a citation, requiring the respondent-appellee to show cause why it should not file schedules applicable to the class of business not included in the former report, and for convenience these customers will be referred to as pipe line customers.
The response filed with the Department was an allegation that the sales in question constituted transactions in interstate commerce, and therefore the Department was without power to regulate. The cause was set for hearing. Evidence was introduced, witnesses were examined and cross-examined, and a brief was filed by the respondent. Thereupon, the Department made a finding of facts, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Smith
...Ohio Gas Co. v. Tax Comm., 283 U.S. 465; Southern Natural Gas Corp. v. Alabama, 301 U.S. 148; Department of Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 194 Ark. 354, 108 S.W. (2d) 586. (d) The reduction in the pressure of the gas by the seller as an incident to the delivery thereof to t......
-
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Smith
...with its order. The circuit court of Arkansas held the order of the Department void. Upon appeal the Supreme Court of Arkansas (194 Ark. 354, 108 S.W.2d 586) held that the and deliveries were not free from state regulation because parts of interstate commerce and directed compliance with th......
-
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Lee
... ... It owned pipe lines located in Texas, ... Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Pensacola, Florida. It ... sold ... public utility selling gas locally at retail in the City of ... 297, 39 S.Ct. 125, 63 L.Ed. 255; Department of Public ... Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 194 ... ...
-
Southern Kraft Corp. v. Hardin
... ... prosecuted by Department of Public Utilities in 1937. It was ... then held that ansas Louisiana Gas Company should include ... in its reports to the ... See Department of ... Public Utilities v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas ... Company, 194 Ark. 354, 108 S.W.2d 586; ... ...