Department of Revenue of State of Fla. v. Markham, 58216
| Decision Date | 12 March 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 58216,58216 |
| Citation | 396 So.2d 1120 |
| Parties | DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF the STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. William MARKHAM, as Broward County Property Appraiser et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and E. Wilson Crump, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Joel M. Weissman of Christiansen, Jacknin & Myers, Palm Beach, and Gaylord A. Wood, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.
On the basis of a direct conflict of decisions, the Department of Revenue has asked us to review an adverse ruling by the First District Court of Appeals, reported at 381 So.2d 1101, to the effect that household goods owned by nonresidents were exempt from ad valorem taxation. Despite an extensive legal analysis by a majority of the district court with regard to the tax issue presented, we are compelled to reverse the decision on the ground the lawsuit was improperly commenced by one who lacked legal standing and should never have been entertained. 1
This proceeding was a declaratory action brought in 1978 by William Markham, as property appraiser (later joined by another appraiser as intervenor), who claimed to be in doubt as to the law, or unable to apply it, with respect to taxation of household goods. Markham also expressed his dissatisfaction with the wisdom of the law. A majority of the district court ruled that the appraisers had standing to maintain the suit, essentially relying on a 1972 precedent from this Court. A more thorough, contrary analysis of the standing issue appears in Judge Ervin's dissent, however, beginning in 381 So.2d at 1111. We align ourselves with that analysis.
For important policy reasons, courts have developed special rules concerning the standing of governmental officials to bring a declaratory judgment action questioning a law those officials are duty-bound to apply. As a general rule, a public official may only seek a declaratory judgment when he is "willing to perform his duties, but ... prevented from doing so by others." Reid v. Kirk, 257 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla.1972). Disagreement with a constitutional or statutory duty, or the means by which it is to be carried out, does not create a justiciable controversy or provide an occasion to give an advisory judicial opinion. See Askew v. City of Ocala, 348 So.2d 308 (Fla.1977). Since the property appraisers under section 195.027(1), Florida Statutes (1977), had a clear statutory duty to comply with the prescribed Department of Revenue regulations governing the taxability of household goods, 2 they clearly lacked standing for declaratory relief in their governmental capacities.
Because this case was filed by Markham not only in his official capacity but as a citizen and taxpayer, we must also consider whether those capacities supply standing. We conclude they do not.
The complaint for declaratory relief contained no allegation of any special injury, and it did not attack the constitutionality of the taxing statutes in question. It has long been the rule in Florida that, in the absence of a constitutional challenge, a taxpayer may bring suit only upon a showing of special injury which is distinct from that suffered by other taxpayers in the taxing district. Department of Administration v. Horne, 269 So.2d 659 (Fla.1972); Rickman v. Whitehurst, 73 Fla. 152, 74 So. 205 (1917). The rationale for the rule was recently restated in Paul v. Blake, 376 So.2d 256, 259 (Fla.3d DCA 1979):
This rule is based on the sound policy ground that without a special injury standing requirement, the courts would in all likelihood be faced with a great number of frivolous lawsuits filed by disgruntled taxpayers, who, along with much of the taxpaying public these days, are not entirely pleased with certain of the taxing and spending decisions of their elective representatives. It is felt...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
West Farms Mall, LLC v. West Hartford
...the unlawful exercise of the state or county's taxing and spending power." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dept. of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So.2d 1120, 1122 (Fla. 1981) (noting that, absent special injury, taxpayer standing only permitted when allegation of violation of state constituti......
-
Godheim v. City of Tampa, 82-1845
...and seem both reasonable and fair. 376 So.2d at 259-60. The supreme court once again addressed the subject in Department of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), and held that one suing in the capacity of a citizen and taxpayer did not have standing to seek a determination of wheth......
-
Henson v. HealthSouth Medical Center, Inc.
...as was the case in Horne. See, e.g., North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Fornes, 476 So.2d 154, 155-56 (Fla.1985); Department of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981). Because Henson's claims are not based on any constitutional challenge, we decline to recognize standing based upon the all......
-
Emerick v. Town of Glastonbury
...legal proceedings to prevent the unlawful exercise of the state or county's taxing and spending power.... Dept. of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So.2d 1120, 1122 (Fla.1981) (noting that, absent special injury, taxpayer standing only permitted when allegation of violation of state constitution's t......
-
Procedural remedies
...1190, 1192 (Fla. 1995). 4. Martinez v. Scanlan , 582 So.2d 1167, 1170 (Fla. 1991). 5. Department of Revenue of State of Fla. v. Markham , 396 So.2d 1120, 1122 (Fla. 1981), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Crossings At Fleming Island Cmty. Dev. Dist. v. Echeverri , 991 So.......
-
Fuchs v. Robbins dictum on property appraiser standing to challenge taxing statutes inconsistent with longstanding precedent set in Atlantic Coast Line.
...This standing doctrine has been applied expressly to property appraisers challenging tax statutes. In Department of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1981), the Florida Supreme Court held that a property appraiser who disapproved of a statute on taxation of household goods and perso......
-
The Deep Roots of Florida's Public Official Standing Doctrine and Its Vital Role in Preserving Our Constitutional Separation of Powers.
...official standing doctrine" was not actually used until Judge Rowe's opinion in Santa Rosa Dunes. (47) Dep't of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So. 2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 1981) (holding that the property appraiser lacked standing to challenge an administrative (48) Atl. Coast Line, 94 So. at 682. (49)......