Department of Transp. v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, Inc.
| Decision Date | 26 February 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 35498,35498 |
| Parties | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. DIXIE HIGHWAY BOTTLE SHOP, INC. et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Steven Schaikewitz, Charles Pritchard, Abraham A. Sharony, Atlanta, for appellant.
Thomas C. Bianco, Joseph G. Davis, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees.
Certiorari was granted to consider the rulings of the Court of Appeals regarding the concepts of "uniqueness" and "total destruction of the business" as they relate to the recovery of business losses as a separate item of damages in a partial taking condemnation case involving the interests of a lessor and a lessee. Dixie Hwy. Bottle Shop, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp., 150 Ga.App. 839, 258 S.E.2d 646 (1979).
Put in the simplest of terms, this court has been asked to square with each other the decisions of the Court of Appeals in Dept. of Transp. v. Dent, 142 Ga.App. 94, 235 S.E.2d 610 (1977), and Dept. of Transp. v. Kendricks, 148 Ga.App. 242, 250 S.E.2d 854 (1978).
The rules stated in those two cases are not in conflict. The distinction lies in whether, as in Dent, the potential leasehold interests are merged in the owner of the fee or, as in Kendricks, the interests of the landowning lessor and of the lessee businessman are separate and distinct.
When the business belongs to the landowner, total destruction of the business at the location must be proven before business losses may be recovered as a separate element of compensation. Dent, supra. On the other hand, when the business belongs to a separate lessee, the lessee may recover for business losses as an element of compensation separate from the value of the land whether the destruction of his business is total or merely partial, provided only that the loss is not remote or speculative. Kendricks, supra. In either event, business losses are recoverable as a separate item only if the property is "unique." Kendricks, supra; Dent, supra.
The meaning of the term "unique" is as set forth in Housing Authority, etc., of Atlanta v. Southern R. Co., 245 Ga. 229, 259 S.E.2d 479.
Whether or not property is unique is a jury question. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Ply-Marts, Inc., 144 Ga.App. 482, 241 S.E.2d 599 (1978). The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of the principles stated in this opinion.
Judgment vacated and remanded.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Macon-Bibb County Water & Sewerage Authority v. Reynolds
...369, 287 S.E.2d 85; Housing Authority Etc. of Atlanta v. Southern Railway Co., 245 Ga. 229, 230(1), 264 S.E.2d 174; DOT v. Dixie Bottle Shop, 245 Ga. 314, 265 S.E.2d 10. Nichols distinguishes the two terms and restricts the word "unique" to property not of a type generally bought or sold in......
-
Department of Transp. v. Acree Oil Co.
...as a separate item only if the property is "unique" and the loss is not remote or speculative. Dept. of Transp. v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, 245 Ga. 314, 315, 265 S.E.2d 10 (1980). This condemnation did not involve the taking of any leasehold interest, so there was no lessee to recover bus......
-
Department of Transp. v. George
...operated by the property owner. See Bowers v. Fulton County, 221 Ga. 731, 739, 146 S.E.2d 884 (1966); Department of Transp. v. Dixie Hwy. Bottle Shop, 245 Ga. 314, 265 S.E.2d 10 (1980). There was at least some evidence in this case that the appellee's property was uniquely suited to the pur......
-
Toler v. Ga. Dep't of Transp.
...business is total or merely partial, provided only that the loss is not remote or speculative.” Dept. of Transp. v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, Inc., 245 Ga. 314, 315, 265 S.E.2d 10 (1980). Therefore, “[b]usiness [loss] is not an element of consequential damages, but an entirely separate ele......
-
A Critical Review of Law of Business Loss Claims in Georgia Eminent Domain Jurisprudence - Charles M. Cork, Iii
...Ga. App. 242, 250 S.E.2d 854 (1978). 49. Id. at 245-46, 250 S.E.2d at 857-58. 50. Williams, 124 Ga. App. at 647, 185 S.E.2d at 618. 51. 245 Ga. 314, 265 S.E.2d 10 (1980). 52. Id. at 314-15, 265 S.E.2d at 10. 53. Id. 54. Id. at 315, 265 S.E.2d at 10 (citation omitted). 55. Id. at 314-15, 265......
-
Zoning and Land Use Law - Dennis J. Webb Jr., Marcia Mccrory Ernst, Davene D. Walker, and Kelley B. Gray
...S.E.2d at 551. 106. Id. 107. Id. 108. Id. (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Dep't of Transp. v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, Inc., 245 Ga. 314, 314, 265 S.E.2d 10, 10 (1980)). 109. Id. (quoting Hous. Auth. of Atlanta v. Troncalli, 111 Ga. App. 515, 518, 142 S.E.2d 93, 95 (1965)). 11......