Depee v. Grand Lodge of A.O.U.W. of Iowa

• Decision Date: 21 October 1898
• Citation: 76 N.W. 798,106 Iowa 747
• Parties: LAURINDA J. DEPEE, Appellant, v. GRAND LODGE OF A. O. U. W., of Iowa Defendant, and OTIS B. DEPEE, Appellee, v. GRAND LODGE OF A. O. U. W., of Iowa Defendant
• Court: Iowa Supreme Court

76 N.W. 798

106 Iowa 747

LAURINDA J. DEPEE, Appellant, v. GRAND LODGE OF A. O. U. W., of Iowa Defendant, and OTIS B. DEPEE, Appellee, v. GRAND LODGE OF A. O. U. W., of Iowa Defendant

Supreme Court of Iowa, Des Moines

October 21, 1898

Appeal from Woodbury District Court.--HON. F. R. GAYNOR, Judge.

THIS is a contest between Laurinda J. Depee and Otis B. Depee over the avails of a certificate of membership in the Grand Lodge A. O. U. W., issued to one Alonzo Depee, the husband of Laurinda J. Each claims to be the beneficiary named in the certificate. The lodge makes no defense to the proceeding but stands ready to pay the amount due to him who is found to be entitled thereto. The trial court found that Otis B. Depee is the rightful beneficiary, and entitled to the fund, and Laurinda J. Depee appeals.

Affirmed.

Hallam & Stevenson for appellant.

Lynn & Foley for appellee.

Henderson & Berry for defendant.

OPINION

DEEMER, C. J.

The original certificate, issued in the year 1878, made appellant the beneficiary. Appellee contends, and the lower court found, however, that Alonzo Depee made a change of beneficiary some time in the year 1890, and directed the lodge to issue a new certificate, making Otis B. Depee, his brother, the beneficiary. On the back of the original certificate, under date of December 11, 1890, appears what purports to be a revocation of the direction as to payment, and an order directing payment to be made to Otis B. Depee, signed, "A. L. Depee." It is conceded by all parties that Alonzo Depee did not personally sign this revocation and order. Appellee contends, however, that it was signed by E. E. Wells or D. A. Winne, and that whichever one signed it in the name of A. L. Depee did so with authority. He also contends that appellant had no interest in the original certificate, and that the change of beneficiary, although irregular, cannot be questioned by any one except the lodge.

It may be conceded that a by-law pointing out the manner in which a change of beneficiary may be made is directory, and cannot be taken advantage of by parties claiming the insurance; but it is, nevertheless, true that the holder of the certificate must have, in fact, made a change in order to defeat the original beneficiary. Whether Alonzo Depee did this or not is the controlling question in the case. The action is at law and the finding of the court to which the case was submitted has the force and...