Deseret Sav. Bank v. Walker
Decision Date | 09 September 1931 |
Docket Number | 4996 |
Citation | 78 Utah 241,2 P.2d 609 |
Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Parties | DESERET SAVINGS BANK v. WALKER et al |
Appeal from District Court, Fifth District, Millard County; Thomas H. Burton, Judge.
Suit by the Deseret Savings Bank against Josephine B. Walker, A. W Steele, and others. From the judgment, defendant A. W. Steele appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Geo. Y Wallace, of Salt Lake City, for appellant.
Van Cott, Riter & Farnsworth and J. A. Melville, Jr., all of Salt Lake City, for respondents.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff providing for foreclosure and sale of 80 acres of land in Millard county, Utah, [78 Utah 243] and 80 shares of stock in Delta Canal Company, A. W. Steele, one of the defendants, appeals from that part of the judgment "wherein 40 shares of stock in Delta Canal Company evidenced by certificate 1718 were ordered sold in satisfaction of plaintiff's mortgage and the interests therein of said A. W. Steele and Mrs. A. W. Steele were foreclosed."
Prior to April 17, 1925, the appellant, A. W. Steele, owned 80 acres of land near Delta described as the E. 1/2 of the N.W. 1/4 of Sec. 34, Tp. 16 S., R. 7 W., Salt Lake Meridian, together with 80 shares of water stock appurtenant to the land evidenced by certificate 1633 in the Delta Canal Company. This he sold to the defendants Josephine B. Walker and W. R. Walker, her husband. The Walkers did not pay cash, but arranged to borrow $ 4,000 from the Deseret Savings Bank by mortgage on the land and water stock and instructed the bank to pay the money to Steele after deducting certain amounts to pay back taxes and expenses. The several steps were taken at the same time. The Steeles gave their deed to the Walkers for the land and indorsed and surrendered certificate 1633. The Walkers gave their mortgage to the bank covering the land and the water stock, and the bank turned the money over to Steele. Steele also received as part of the purchase price a note of the Walkers for $ 2,000 and a mortgage subordinate to that of the bank on the same land and water stock and also a crop mortgage on all crops grown on the 80 acres of land. At the time it was expected that the Walkers would divide the farm, keep and occupy one 40-acre tract with 40 shares of water appurtenant thereto, and sell the other 40-acre tract and 40 shares of water to a prospective purchaser. The only defendant that appeared in the suit was A. W. Steele who filed an answer making certain denials and admissions and setting up his note and mortgage executed by the Walkers. Plaintiff's complaint is in the usual and proper form containing all necessary averments to entitle it to a judgment for the indebtedness claimed and the foreclosure of its mortgage on the land and water stock.
The vital issue raised on this appeal is set forth in appellant's assignments of errors Nos. 1 and 2, which are as follows:
"1. The trial court erred in its judgment foreclosing the appellant's interest in the forty
(40) shares of water stock evidenced by certificate No. 1718 of the Delta Canal Company.
A consideration of these assignments requires that we set out fully those portions of the complaint and answer referring to certificate No. 1718. These are paragraph 6 of the complaint and paragraph 4 of the answer, which are as follows:
The attorney who filed the answer for Steele withdrew as such attorney before trial by serving and filing the proper notice. Steele was notified by the plaintiff of such withdrawal. When the case was called for trial, Steele appeared in person and entered into a stipulation which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Yeargin v. AUDITING DIV. OF STATE TAX
...an estoppel upon the parties thereto and is conclusive of all matters necessarily included in the stipulation." Deseret Sav. Bank v. Walker, 78 Utah 241, 252, 2 P.2d 609 (1931). Such a stipulation "has all the binding effect of findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the court upon ......
-
First Savings Bank of Ogden v. Brown
... ... issue and put the plaintiff to his proof. Imlay v ... Gubler, 77 Utah 547, 298 P. 383; Deseret Savings ... Bank v. Walker, 78 Utah 241, 2 P.2d 609; ... Kernin v. City of Coquille, 143 Ore ... ...
-
Coalville City v. Lundgren
...from having to remove the signs as agreed in the Stipulation. A stipulation is construed as a contract. Deseret Sav. Bank v. Walker, 78 Utah 241, 251, 2 P.2d 609, 614 (1931). "The law is well settled that a material breach by one party to a contract excuses further performance by the non-br......
-
Pacheco v. Hilo Elec. Light Co., Ltd., 5385
...significance by the State. A construction having such effects is disfavored by the law. See, e. g. Deseret Sav. Bank v. Walker, 78 Utah 241, 251-252, 2 P.2d 609, 614 (1931).9 I have in the past dissented from this court's adherence to the common law doctrine of contributory negligence. See ......