Deskin v. United States Reserve Ins. Corporation
Decision Date | 27 June 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 16023.,16023. |
Citation | 298 S.W. 103 |
Parties | DESKIN v. UNITED STATES RESERVE INS. CORPORATION. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Allen C. Southern, Judge.
Suit by Nannie Marvin Deskin against the United States Reserve Insurance Corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.
Ernest D. Martin and J. H. Newman, both of Kansas City, for appellant.
E. H. McVey and Samuel R. Freet, both of Kansas City, for respondent.
This is a suit on two life insurance policies, issued November 6, 1923, to John C. Deskin, payable to Nannie Deskin, deceased's wife, as beneficiary. Petition was in usual form pleading the policies, the death, etc. The answer was a general denial, and the answer further averred that the assured executed a note to cover the first annual premium on the policies; that the note was not paid, therefore the policies were canceled and lapsed for failure to pay the premium note when due. The reply denied the provision authorizing the cancellation or providing for lapse, forfeiture, or cancellation by reason of the nonpayment of note or notes for the first year's premium. The reply further pleads a waiver in the following terms;
"If there was any forfeiture or lapse or right of cancellation of said policies or insurance or either of them by reason of the nonpayment of any premium note or notes executed by the assured, John Cyrus Deskin, that then such lapse or forfeiture or cancellation or right of cancellation was waived by the defendant by giving and sending notice to the assured on each of the policies in suit; giving notice of the maturity of the two annual premiums on each of said policies maturing November 6, 1924, and demanding payment, whereby defendant elected to and did treat and continue said policies and each of them in full force and effect and did waive any default, lapse, or forfeiture by reason of the failure or alleged failure to pay any premium note."
The policies insured the life of John C. Deskin. The assured died October 15, 1924. Notice of death was given and a request for forms upon which to make proof of death. The company denied liability. Proof of death was duly furnished. There seems to be no difference in the forms of the policies in the two counts. The policies provide:
The material part of the policy conditions read as follows:
The application, which is attached, is as follows:
It will be noted that there is no provision for cancellation.
The president of the company testified that a receipt given was on the regular form when the premium was paid.
A receipt upon the regular form was issued to deceased. The receipt was as follows:
The evidence shows that when the application was made a promissory note for $188.-60 was given. The note was signed by John C. Deskin, payable to the order of "himself." The note was indorsed on the back "John C. Deskin." Thus the note was made payable to bearer. These notes were renewed on January 23, 1924, and on April 22, 1924, the two notes were made into one note which was given for $380.20. J. B. Rutherford, superintendent of agencies, was instrumental in having the loan renewed. This last note was not paid.
When the notes were received they were entered upon the records under the heading, "Policy Loans." At the bottom of the record is a memorandum, "Canceled on July 25, 1924, for nonpayment of note." In the same record the following appears: "Premium paid 11-6-23, note $188.60."
On July 15, 1924, a letter was written to deceased as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bennett v. National Fire Ins. Co.
...218 Mo. App. 395, 277 S.W. 349; Rollins v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n, 204 Mo. App. 679, 220 S.W. 1022; Deskin v. United States Ins. Corp., 221 Mo. App. 1151, 298 S.W. 103; Wood v. K.C. Life Ins. Co., 228 Mo. App. 797, 75 S.W. (2d) 412; Rieger v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 110 S.W. (2d) 878; ......
-
Laustrup v. Bankers Life Co.
...& Ladies, 174 Mo.App. l.c. 679; Andrus v. Fidelity Mut. Life, 168 Mo. 151; Headley v. Central Life, 227 S.W. l.c. 923; Deskin v. U.S. Reserve Ins. Corp., 298 S.W. 103. Reinstatement. Mettner v. Northwestern Natl. Life Ins. Co., 103 N.W. 112; Chambers v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 138 S.W.2......
-
Laustrup v. Bankers Life Co.
...& Ladies, 174 Mo. App. l.c. 679; Andrus v. Fidelity Mut. Life, 168 Mo. 151; Headley v. Central Life, 227 S.W. l.c. 923; Deskin v. U.S. Reserve Ins. Corp., 298 S.W. 103. (3) Reinstatement. Mettner v. Northwestern Natl. Life Ins. Co., 103 N.W. 112; Chambers v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 138 ......
-
Hawkins v. Wash. Fid. Nat. Ins. Co., 22975.
...Fid. & Dep. Co., 317 Mo. 1078, 298 S.W. 83, 91; Cooper v. Nat. Life Ins. Co., 212 Mo. App. 266, 253 S.W. 465, 469; Deskin v. Ins. Corp., 221 Mo. App. 1151, 298 S.W. 103, 107, and cases there cited; Zeilman v. Ins. Assn., 224 Mo. App. 145, 22 S.W. (2d) 88. (4) The court erred in giving plain......