Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Hunter
| Decision Date | 14 November 2012 |
| Citation | 954 N.Y.S.2d 181,100 A.D.3d 810,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 07781 |
| Parties | DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., respondent, v. Stefane HUNTER, appellant, et al., defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Patrick H. Jones, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, PLUMMER E. LOTT, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Stefane Hunter appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Liebowitz, J.), entered February 23, 2011, which denied her motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(3) and (4) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated July 13, 2009, entered upon her default in appearing or answering the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(3) and (4) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale that was entered upon her default in appearing or answering the complaint. The defendant argued that the plaintiff lacked standing to commence the foreclosure action, and therefore, the plaintiff committed fraud upon the court and the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the matter. The Supreme Court denied the motion, and the defendant appeals.
The defendant's arguments pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(3) and (4) are without merit, as the record contains no evidence of fraud or misrepresentation, and an alleged lack of standing is not a jurisdictional defect ( see Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Mastropaolo, 42 A.D.3d 239, 244, 837 N.Y.S.2d 247). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion,inter alia, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP v. Bertram
...868 [2d Dept.2013] ; US Bank Natl. Ass'n v. Tate, 102 A.D.3d 859, 958 N.Y.S.2d 722 [2d Dept. 2013] ; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hunter, 100 A.D.3d 810, 954 N.Y.S.2d 181 [2d Dept.2012] ; Bank of New York v. Alderazi, 99 A.D.3d 837, 951 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2d Dept.2012] ; U.S. Bank Natl. Ass'......
-
Bank of Am. v. Candy Maeder, PNC Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, 060078/2013.
...[2d Dept 2013], supra; US Bank Natl. Ass'n v. Tate, 102 AD3d 859, 958 N.Y.S.2d 722 [2d Dept 2013] ; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hunter, 100 AD3d 810, 954 N.Y.S.2d 181 [2d Dept 2012] ; Bank of New York v. Alderazi, 99 AD3d 837, 951 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2d Dept 2012] ; U.S. Bank v. Emmanuel, 83......
-
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Muskopf
...868 [2d Dept 2013] ; US Bank Natl. Ass'n v. Tate, 102 AD3d 859, 958 N.Y.S.2d 722 [2d Dept 2013] ; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hunter, 100 AD3d 810, 954 N.Y.S.2d 181 [2d Dept 2012] ; Bank of New York v. Alderazi, 99 AD3d 837, 951 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2d Dept 2012] ; U.S. Bank Natl. Ass'n. v. D......
-
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Rooney
...case before it” (Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Mastropaolo,42 A.D.3d 239, 243, 837 N.Y.S.2d 247; see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hunter,100 A.D.3d 810, 811, 954 N.Y.S.2d 181).The Supreme Court properly denied Rooney's motion, in effect, to vacate his default in opposing the plaintiff......