Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Dixon

Decision Date06 March 2012
Citation939 N.Y.S.2d 705,93 A.D.3d 630,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 01650
PartiesDEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., respondent, v. Eldon DIXON, defendant,Patrick Hollingsworth, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Patrick Hollingsworth, Hollis, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Frenkel Lambert Weiss Weisman & Gordon, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Joseph F. Battista of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendant Patrick Hollingsworth*706 appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), entered July 6, 2009, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated January 16, 2008, and entered upon his default in appearing or answering the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the motion of the defendant Patrick Hollingsworth (hereinafter the defendant) to vacate the underlying judgment of foreclosure and sale on the ground of lack of proper service of process. The defendant's conclusory denial of receipt of a copy of the summons and complaint was insufficient to rebut the presumption of proper service established by the affidavit of the plaintiff's process server ( see Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Albert, 78 A.D.3d 983, 984–985, 912 N.Y.S.2d 96; City of New York v. Miller, 72 A.D.3d 726, 727, 898 N.Y.S.2d 643; Scarano v. Scarano, 63 A.D.3d 716, 880 N.Y.S.2d 682).

Further, contrary to the defendant's contention, the foreclosure and sale were not stayed by virtue of the filing of his third bankruptcy petition ( see 11 USC § 362[c][4][A][i] ).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • U.S. Bank v. Abu
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 12, 2019
    ...alone, without any factual elaboration, is insufficient to warrant granting a traverse hearing. (Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Dixon, 93 A.D.3d 630, 939 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2d Dept. 2012] [in mortgage foreclosure action, defendant's conclusory denial of receipt of a copy of thesummons and comp......
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Gioia
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 13, 2014
    ...724, 725, 957 N.Y.S.2d 868;Reich v. Redley, 96 A.D.3d 1038, 947 N.Y.S.2d 564; [980 N.Y.S.2d 537]Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Dixon, 93 A.D.3d 630, 939 N.Y.S.2d 705). The record contains no evidence of fraud or misrepresentation, and an alleged lack of standing is not a jurisdictional de......
  • Bank of N.Y. v. Krausz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 9, 2016
    ...Co. v. Pietranico, 102 A.D.3d 724, 957 N.Y.S.2d 868 ; Reich v. Redley, 96 A.D.3d 1038, 947 N.Y.S.2d 564 ; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Dixon, 93 A.D.3d 630, 939 N.Y.S.2d 705 ; U.S. Natl. Bank Assn. v. Melton, 90 A.D.3d 742, 743, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352 ; Citimortgage, Inc. v. Phillips, 82 A.D.......
  • Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pietranico
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 16, 2013
    ...of service of the plaintiff's process server ( see Reich v. Redley, 96 A.D.3d 1038, 947 N.Y.S.2d 564;Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Dixon, 93 A.D.3d 630, 939 N.Y.S.2d 705;U.S. Natl. Bank Assn. v. Melton, 90 A.D.3d 742, 743, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352;Citimortgage, Inc. v. Phillips, 82 A.D.3d 1032, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT