Development Enterprises of Raleigh v. Ortiz, 386P87
| Decision Date | 03 September 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 386P87,386P87 |
| Citation | 360 S.E.2d 84,320 N.C. 630 |
| Parties | DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES OF RALEIGH, a North Carolina General Partnership, Plaintiff, v. Betty Faye Howard Bland ORTIZ; Estate of Donald E. Bland; North Carolina National Bank as Administrator, C.T.A. of the Estate of Donald E. Bland; Jeffrey Edwin Bland, Donna Helene Bland; Sumer Nicole Bland; Megan Elizabeth Bland; Elizabeth A. McCuiston Warren; Elizabeth McCuiston Warren, Administratrix of the Estate of William T. McCuiston; Estate of William T. McCuiston; Stephanie Anne McCuiston; William T. McCuiston, Jr. and William Tyler McCuiston, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. v. James L. McMILLAN, Jr., Curtis Westbrook, Ronnie W. Snotherly and Jerry A. Cook, Third-Party Defendants. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Stephen T. Daniel, Morganton, and James L. Blackburn, Raleigh, for defendants and third-party plaintiffs.
Boxley, Bolton & Garber, Raleigh, for plaintiff and third-party defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of September 1987."
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Mosley & Mosley Builders, Inc. v. Landin Ltd.
...of the trial court." Development Enterprises v. Ortiz, 86 N.C.App. 191, 195, 356 S.E.2d 922, 925 (1987), disc. rev. denied, 320 N.C. 630, 360 S.E.2d 84, citing Smith v. McRary, 306 N.C. 664, 295 S.E.2d 444 (1982). "The exercise of the court's discretion is not reviewable absent a clear show......
-
Carter v. Rockingham County Bd. of Educ.
...a clear showing of abuse." Development Enterprises v. Ortiz, 86 N.C.App. 191, 195, 356 S.E.2d 922, 925, disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 630, 360 S.E.2d 84 (1987). The party opposing the amendment has the burden to establish that it would be prejudiced by the amendment. Mauney v. Morris, 316 N......
- Dillingham v. Yeargin Const. Co., 638PA86