Devers v. Howard
Decision Date | 14 June 1898 |
Citation | 144 Mo. 671,46 S.W. 625 |
Parties | DEVERS v. HOWARD et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Action by Merritt L. Devers against L. W. Howard, Ashman H. Vandivert, and George L. Phillips. A judgment for defendants was affirmed by the Kansas City court of appeals, which certified the cause to the supreme court. Reversed.
J. W. Peery, for appellant. Sallee & Goodman and D. J. Heaston, for respondents.
This case was appealed from the circuit court of Harrison county to the Kansas City court of appeals, where the judgment was affirmed; but thereafter the case was certified to this court by the court of appeals, upon the ground that one of the judges of that court was of the opinion that the decision is in conflict with the decision of this court in the case of Board v. Woods, 77 Mo. 197.
This is an action upon a bond executed by the defendant Howard as principal, and defendants Vandivert and Phillips as his securities, to the city of Bethany, Mo. On the 18th day of June, 1894, Howard entered into a contract with the city of Bethany to dig for it a well on lot 4, block 7, of Blackburn's addition to said city, for the sum of $800. At the time of the execution of the contract, said Howard, as principal, and Ashman H. Vandivert and George L. Phillips, as securities, executed and delivered to said city their bond in the penal sum of $1,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of the work by Howard, and the payment by him for all labor done on said well, and for all materials furnished for or used on the same. The conditions and covenants of the bond, as set out in the petition, are that, whereas said L. W. Howard had on that day entered into a written contract with said city of Bethany, by which he had agreed to dig a well, and complete said well, for said city, for the sum of $800; the said L. W. Howard to pay for all labor done on said well, and for all material used or furnished for same; the said well to be dug and walled up and finished according to certain written plans and specifications, which were made a part of said contract; and if the said L. W. Howard should dig said well according to his said contract with said city of Bethany, and according to the plans and specifications, and should pay for all labor done to said well, and also pay for all material furnished for or used on the same, and should complete said contract in a good and workmanlike manner by the 18th day of July, 1894, then said obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The petition then proceeds as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Bowman
...63 Ia. 152, 18 N.W. 851; Williamsv. Markland, 15 Ind.App. 669; 44 N.E. 562; St. Louisv. Von Phul, 133 Mo. 561, 34 S.W. 844; Deversv. Howard, 144 Mo. 671, 46 S.W. 625; Lymanv. Lincoln, 38 Neb. 794, 57 N.W. 531; Samplev. Hale, Neb. 220, 51 N.W. 837; Plumbing & Heating Co.v. McClay, 43 Neb. 64......
-
Wiss v. Royal Indemnity Company
... ... [City of St. Louis ... to use of Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von Phul, 133 Mo ... 561, 34 S.W. 843; Devers v. Howard, 144 Mo. 671, 46 ... S.W. 625; City of Bethany v. Howard, 149 Mo. 504, 51 ... S.W. 94.] ... Having ... in mind ... ...
-
Gerber v. City of Kansas City
...v. Youmans, 213 Mo. 151, in support of their contention that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant sureties. In Devers v. Howard the contract was one for the digging of well for the city of Bethany. The contract required the contractor to pay for all labor and mater......
-
Springfield Gas & Elec. Co. v. Graves
...beneficiary. City of St. Louis v. G.H. Wright Contracting Co., 202 Mo. 451, 101 S.W. 6; Uhrich v. Globe Surety Co., supra; Devers v. Howard, 144 Mo. 671, 46 S.W. 625. City of Springfield owed no obligation or duty, legal or equitable, to preferred stockholders of Springfield Company. Powers......