Devoto v. Devoto
Decision Date | 14 October 1930 |
Parties | George J. Devoto, Appellant, v. Nicholas A. Devoto |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis; Hon. Robert W Hall, Judge.
Transferred to St. Louis Court of Appeals.
Taylor R. Young for appellant.
Abbott Fauntleroy, Cullen & Edwards for respondent.
Ferguson C. Seddon and Ellison, CC., concur.
This is a suit for partition of real estate and for an accounting. Plaintiff and defendant are brothers. The material allegations of the petition are: That plaintiff and defendant are seized as tenants in common of certain described real property situate in the city of St. Louis "that the share to said lands to which plaintiff is entitled is one-half, and that the interest of the defendant therein is one-half, and that plaintiff and defendant are the fee simple owners thereof;" that plaintiff has expended various sums of money for the upkeep and preservation of the common property, which are set out in minute detail in his Exhibit A; that plaintiff has collected various sums of money in the way of rent for which he should be charged, and that after all credits are allowed the balance of the amounts so expended by plaintiff in behalf of the common property is $ 3,248.17. Continuing, the petition alleges that the property cannot be partitioned in kind without great prejudice to the owners and prays that partition be made, the land ordered sold, for an accounting between plaintiff and defendant, and that whatever sum may be found due to plaintiff in said accounting be paid to plaintiff out of the proceeds of such sale, and that after all other costs and expenses of the proceedings have been paid the net balance be divided equally between plaintiff and defendant.
Defendant's answer denies each and every allegation in plaintiff's petition except those specifically admitted; denies that plaintiff has paid the charges for the upkeep of the premises as alleged in his petition and set out in his Exhibit A; admits "that the fee simple title in and to the real estate described in plaintiff's petition is now owned by the parties plaintiff and defendant in equal parts, that is -- plaintiff and defendant is each entitled to an undivided one-half interest in said real estate." The answer then charges that plaintiff is indebted to defendant in the amount of one-half of an encumbrance against the property alleged to have been paid by defendant and one-half of certain rents and profits from the premises, all of which aggregate $ 4,125, and asks for an accounting. The reply is a general denial.
The cause coming on for hearing, it appears, from the judgment hereinafter set out, that plaintiff and defendant in open court "admitted and stated" to the court that the case was "a proper case for partition" of the real property described in the petition, and that under the pleadings the right to a partition was admitted, and acting upon said admissions so made in open court, the court entered an interlocutory decree and judgment, which very closely follows and conforms to the prayer of plaintiff's petition, and which, omitting the land description and the recitation showing the presence at the time of the hearing of the parties plaintiff and defendant both in person and by their respective attorneys, is as follows:
The decree then names a commissioner to make such sale, requires that he file bond and fixes the conditions and terms thereof.
Defendant entered no objection and did not note or preserve any exceptions thereto, but plaintiff filed a motion to set aside the judgment and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Place v. Bland
... ... 948, 2 S.W.2d 771; Rice v ... Griffith, 349 Mo. 373, 161 S.W.2d 220; Cunningham v ... Cunningham, 325 Mo. 1161, 30 S.W.2d 63; Devoto v ... Devoto, 326 Mo. 511, 31 S.W.2d 805; First Natl. Bank ... of Monett v. Kinser, 341 Mo. 819, 109 S.W.2d 1221; ... Salia v. Pillman, 328 ... ...
-
Campbell v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
... ... 651.] Furthermore, a hearing was afforded. A judgment may be ... erroneous yet rendered in due process of law. [DeVoto v ... DeVoto, 326 Mo. 511, 31 S.W.2d 805.] The right to trial by ... jury under the Federal Constitution applies only to trials in ... the United ... ...
-
Lee's Summit Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cross
...the interlocutory judgment in partition and denying this infant appellant a hearing as to the equities of said partition. Devoto v. Devoto, 326 Mo. 511, 31 S.W.2d 807; Devoto v. Devoto, 39 S.W.2d 1084; Carson Hecke, 282 Mo. 580, 222 S.W. 855; Gray v. Clement, 296 Mo. 497, 246 S.W. 942; Lest......
-
Studer v. Harlan
... ... suit, and appellate jurisdiction is therefore vested in this ... Court. [Cunningham v. Cunningham, 325 Mo. 1161, 30 ... S.W.2d 63; Devoto v. Devoto, 326 Mo. 511, 31 S.W.2d ... 805; Herchenroeder v. Herchenroeder, 75 Mo.App ... The ... indebtedness of Maud Young to ... ...